cross-license | Windows Central

Theme me up Scotty

Master the new theme settings in the Windows 10 Creators Update

Microsoft Android

Using Android in the Microsoft ecosystem

Nothing to fear

Why the decline of Windows 10 Mobile won't affect this site

The elephant in the room

Developers, what will it take for Microsoft to win you to the UWP?

Not for everyone

4 reasons why you should buy an all-in-one as your next PC

Postive > negative

It's time to celebrate the GOOD things about Windows Mobile

Responsible recommendations

Do you still recommend Windows phones to family and friends?

1080p vs supersampling vs 4K

Exclusive look at the resolution differences between Scorpio and Xbox One

Sound off!

What would Microsoft have to do to bring you back to Windows Mobile?

Badass on a budget

CHUWI Hi13 review: A Surface Book alternative that costs only $369

From the Forums

Why have things gone so wrong for Windows phone?

Sonic sound

Turn on Windows Sonic and experience spatial audio in Windows 10

Podcast

Windows Central Podcast 46: A Windows phone reset

Hey cortana ... ?

A brief history of Cortana, Microsoft's trusty digital assistant

Scratching the surface

Here's one way Microsoft could make the Surface phone succeed

Beyond the doom and gloom

What does the 'death of Windows phone' mean for Windows Central?

Le sigh

Check out our in-depth Windows 10 Mobile Creators Update review

Let's reminisce

What is the best Lumia of all time? (poll)

Back to school

Why Microsoft’s push into education is a very smart move

#GoGreen

On Earth Day, here's how Microsoft is helping us live a greener life

< >

Shop: Surface Studio | New Surface Book | Xbox One S Bundles | NEW Dell XPS 13"

cross-license

In the ongoing saga between Samsung and Apple, documents came out late last night from the court case that detailed a proposal by Apple to charge Samsung for royalties on their smartphones.

It’s interesting for a few reasons. For one, Apple almost never enters into cross-platform patent royalty deals with other companies, specifically if it is tied to any of their “product differentiating” technologies. Back in 2010 though, Apple was willing to make an exception to this with Samsung because they are a major parts supplier for Cupertino and they wanted to preserve that relationship. Apple was also “shocked” at just how much Samsung was willing to allegedly copy the iPhone.

In the documents, Apple spells out some license terms it was willing to offer Samsung back in October 2010—just a few weeks before Windows Phone 7 became available.  Although Android was offered a $24-per-device royalty fee, which yes, is extremely high, Apple evidently also wanted $9 per ‘Windows Mobile 7’ device as well.

More →