BulletAsylum: Xbox Windows Phone Review

Does anybody remember the 1980 arcade game Missile Command? It was quite a hit back at the dawn of the vidja game phenomenon, though we haven’t seen too many modern sequels beyond the updated XBLA and iPhone versions. Indie developer UberGeekGames (one word) certainly seems familiar with Missile Command, and the tiny team has created a modern tribute in the form of BulletAsylum (also one word). Microsoft considers this a ‘Must Have Game,’ but sadly you won’t find much depth beneath its flashy exterior.

The sky is falling

Aliens are attacking the earth and it’s up to you to save it. Perhaps an unusual scenario in real life, but for the average gamer it’s just Tuesday. BulletAsylum takes place on a static screen with enemies approaching from the top and sides. Players must keep them at bay by controlling one or more turrets at the bottom of the screen. If an enemy touches a tower, it gets destroyed. Once you run out of turrets, the game ends.

Turrets syndrome

In Arcade (the main game mode), you start with a couple of Light Guns and gain more towers as you go along. These include:

  • Light guns: Rapid fire blue lasers, and the cornerstone of any defense.
  • Heavy guns: Slow to fire yellow cannons. Their huge shots pack a big punch.
  • Lasers: These fire even slower than heavy guns, but their long, continuous shots can hit multiple enemies at once.
  • Defensive cities: Green shield generators that protect nearby towers.
  • Overdrive: This isn’t a turret, but I’m sticking it here anyway. I can do that! Anyway, the Overdrive meter fills as you blast enemies. Once it’s full, swiping upward with three fingers unleashes a blast that destroys all regular enemies on-screen.

Point and shoot

You can play BulletAsylum with either one finger or two. A single finger focuses all of your turrets’ fire into a single crosshair, while two fingers creates two crosshairs and splits up the turret fire accordingly. In general, one finger does the job. In fact, once the player acquires a decent number of turrets (how long that takes varies by mode), he or she doesn’t need to move the crosshair at all. Park it right in the center of the screen and the guns will kill just about every regular enemy. You can also play by waving a finger back and forth like crazy – either method will get you extremely far into the game.

That’s BulletAsylum’s biggest problem – it’s too easy to do well and requires virtually no skill. Sure, there’s a combo system that rewards hitting consecutive enemies of the same type. But you hardly ever have the choice not to fire at enemies, so combos are mostly out of the player’s hands and have very little impact on overall score.

Upgrades and Modifiers

BulletAsylum’s upgrade system fares better than its combo system. After each game, you’ll earn credits that can be spent on upgrades. You can upgrade each of the aforementioned turrets several times, permanently increasing their firepower and firing rate in Arcade and Survival modes. Upgraded shields get larger and can take more hits, while Overdrive charges up faster.

Upgrades make the game easier the more you play, but eventually you’ll have unlocked them all. That’s where Modifiers come in. These cost a lot more to unlock and can significantly alter the way the game works, speeding it up, slowing it down, and more. Visual modifiers include a silly-frilly Peace mode, the insanely-flashing Inmate mode, and more. The 8-Bit mode could have been really cool, swapping out vector graphics for pixel art. Instead, it’s just a terrible-looking pixilation filter.

A mix of modes

BulletAsylum has three game modes:

  • Arcade Mode: The meat of the game. Progress through 30 waves of enemies, gaining new turrets between each wave. After that comes Wave X, an endless wave that bombards players with crazy numbers of enemies.
  • Survival Mode: Start on Wave X with the maximum number of towers and see how long you can last. Curiously, Survival Mode has no Achievements of its own. Still, it’s the best way of earning credits in a hurry.
  • Architect Mode: This more strategic mode smacks of wasted potential. Here you have to purchase towers with points rather than getting them for free. For some reason the difficulty is cranked super high, making it tough to play this mode for fun. There seems to be only one winning strategy – turn on some modifiers to make things easier and then build turrets near the shield in the center. Once you get the sole Architect mode Achievement, I doubt you’ll want to play it again.


Placing towers in Architect mode (like a boss)

Most of BulletAsylum’s Achievements involve reaching certain waves of Arcade mode with high accuracy ratings. You’ll probably need to turn on the Battle Cry modifier to slow things down and then carefully fire single shots to get the Wave 8 accuracy Achievement. Architect Mode’s Achievement, ‘Don’t Cross the Streams’ requires firing four lasers at once - the trick is that you have to make it pretty far before you can afford them. It'll take very careful play to pull off – see this Achievement guide for details.

Also, the ‘Maximum Awesome’ Achievement (fully upgrade everything) doesn’t unlock properly for many people. When it didn’t unlock for me, I turned off the phone, turned it back on, started the game up, and went straight to the Upgrades menu. Then it finally popped. That’s a lot of trouble, but the developers are apparently working on a fix.

Overall Impression

BulletAsylum’s colorful neon graphics and flashy explosions are simplistic but pretty. It also has a quality unlocking system that extends the life of the game more than say, Orbital. But the positives don’t make up for the fact that it takes no skill to play Arcade and Survival modes, resulting in a boring experience. Architect Mode doesn’t help since it takes the challenge too far. Many gamers will enjoy BulletAsylum for a few games, but the simplistic gameplay won’t provide any replay value once the last Achievement has unlocked.

BulletAsylum costs $2.99 and there is a free trial. Get it here from the Store.

QR: BulletAsylum

Paul Acevedo is the Games Editor at Windows Central. A lifelong gamer, he has written about videogames for over 15 years and reviewed over 350 games for our site. Follow him on Twitter @PaulRAcevedo. Don’t hate. Appreciate!

  • This game is bad to the bone. Just live all the action going on.
  • I really enjoy this game, especially enjoyed getting the achievments! I hope they add more achievements to it. As for difficulty, I thought it hit a pretty good balance of reaching casual gamers and still bringing a challenge for more hardcore gamers. It is fun and challenging, but not frustratingly so.
    Overall I rank this in the top ten of the Xbox Live titles.
  • Great game, great looking but didn't take long to blow through.
  • Thanks, Paul.  I really like your reviews!  And I'm glad you reviewed this, because from everything I've seen of this game, I simply could not, and still don't, understand the hoopla about this game. 
    So, needless to say, this will not be a game that I wish to try or purchase; and I totally agree with your assessment of Orbital too.
    PvZ FTW :)
  • Nice to meet someone who agrees with me for a change! ;) But seriously, thanks for the kind words. PvZ is still the best WP7 Xbox Live game so far, alright.
  • Impressive. The review, not the game. Very well written, and it mimics my thoughts on the game so close, it's scary... :)
    Anyways, Architect mode had so much potential... it could be something really awesome. Oh well, maybe next time. These must have games surely were a bit of a disappointment.
    My favourite games so far on wp7: geoDefense; NFS: Undercover; Hydro Thunder and Zombies!!!
  • Thanks man. How do you feel Undercover compares to Hot Pursuit? I'm working on Hot Pursuit right now and it sure requires a LOT of grinding. But I never played Undercover so it's hard for me to know what's improved or gotten worse.
  • I played Hot Pursuit (HP) on my father's 710 (dude is easily impressed with flashy graphics, and HP surely has them), for a long time, and still do whenever I visit him. Tbh, it's a step back, it uses a blatant need to grind and it follows Criterion gaming urgency stunts (which work very well on home consoles) of needing to perform flawlessly in order to pass later stages, like micro seconds separating success from failure. In my opinion, portable and touch screen gaming don't go well with these mechanics, a larger window of failure tolerance is needed, not to mention progression needs to be quicker in such devices.
    That said, English being my 3rd language, I most likely made a mess of a comment and couldn't made myself clear... :/
  • This game is just bad ass! Period.