Starting with Bungie's last Halo creation — Halo: Reach — Halo has gone down a steady path of popularity decline. With each new release after Halo 3, game sales have decreased, along with the overall player base. Halo 5 might be incredibly successful due to its business model, but Halo as a franchise has fallen from its pedestal as the creme de la creme of first-person shooters.
One question many ask is, what caused the decline in the first place? For many, there are specific aspects of the more recent Halo titles that sully the experience — things like the addition of the ability to sprint, art style changes, and quality of story have all been points of grief for Halo community members, among others. Therefore, it is for this reason that I believe that Halo's recent struggles can't be tied down to any one thing. Rather, it is a combination of these things that, when applied to the games together, create an experience that feels and plays very different to Halo's established formula.
With this in mind, I intend to analyze and dissect what I feel are collectively the fanbase's biggest issues with the latest Halo installment — Halo 5 — and identify what Halo 6 will need to change in order to avoid making the same mistakes twice. While a lot of it is subjective, I've spent a lot of time reading into Halo 5's reception and feedback (two years in fact) and I'm confident when I say that what I list below is fairly representative of the way the general community feels about the game. Something to keep in mind is that I myself personally enjoy Halo 5. What I'm saying here doesn't necessarily represent how I feel (though some of it does). My goal in this piece is to identify what I think the community thinks overall, not to push my own views forward.
Since identifying everything wrong with a game such as Halo 5 is a large undertaking, this article would be quite large if I covered everything in one go. In this first article, I'm going to talk about the big stuff:
- Core gameplay
So, activate your energy swords, prime your plasma grenades, and load your battle rifles. Let's dive right in.
Stop reading now if you want to avoid Halo spoilers!
Performance: Polish is a priority
Arguably one of Halo 5's most devastating issues (and The Master Chief Collection's, as well) is the lack of polish. The game is full of performance snags at every turn — game freezes, user interface lag, and poor hit detection in matches only represents the tip of Halo 5's iceberg of bugs. Here, the bugs are not features, as the old saying would lead you to believe. Rather, they do nothing but take away from what Halo 5 has to offer. If features don't work, then there's no point in having them at all. Ask any Halo 5 player how often they use the Theater mode. I'd bet money that the vast majority of them would say rarely, or even never, due to how unreliable it is.
The simple fact is this: the content of your game doesn't matter if the content itself doesn't even work. Halo 6 needs to prioritize performance, and both Microsoft and 343 Industries need to devote adequate time for the game to be optimized efficiently before release.
Story: Halo needs character development and plot clarity
It's no secret by now that the biggest failing point of Halo 5's campaign was its narrative. Halo 5 promised a lot. It promised a chance to meet and connect with Blue Team, the Master Chief's Spartan-II brothers and sisters from childhood, as well as the opportunity to be introduced to four brand new Spartans — Fireteam Osiris. All of these characters would revolve around a plot centered around one of Halo's most beloved characters, Master Chief's AI companion, Cortana, who had returned after Halo 4's emotional conclusion to her story. However, Cortana is not who she once was, and her new plans for the galaxy would shake it to its core.
So, what went wrong? Why was the story received so poorly among fans?
After participating in and listening to as much critical discussion among the Halo community that I could, I've come to the conclusion that the biggest flaws about Halo 5's narrative are the over-saturation of characters and the lack of adequate clarification about the plot.
Having too many characters means that none of them receive adequate development or presentation in the story, and unfortunately, Halo 5 had so many characters in it that none of them felt well written. Generally, in gaming, the most successful stories tend to have only a few main characters, with the rest of the cast supporting as minor roles. In the case of Halo 5 and its plot, the main characters should have been Master Chief, Cortana, Locke, and the Warden Eternal. But, that wasn't the case. Halo 5 attempted to present its entire cast as main characters, with all of them sharing the "center stage" position.
In addition to inadequately characterizing the cast, this issue has the added side effect of taking time away from the plot. With so much time being devoted to giving every character a bit of the spotlight, time spent efficiently providing exposition is reduced. This results in a rushed feeling for the story. Details about the plot that should have been given to the player as they progressed through the game are instead dumped on them all at once at occasional intervals. "Wait, what?" was not an uncommon reaction to Halo 5's unfolding story.
What Halo 6 needs to do is re-adjust the character presentation of Halo 5. Have the game give adequate time to develop and explore the core characters to the narrative, while leaving the minor ones to assist from the sidelines. And that is not a bad thing, by the way.
Stories are often made or broken depending on the quality of their side characters. Good minor characters help to bring the setting of the story to life, as well as contribute to the work's theme — all while leaving the door open for proper, natural flow of in-game events and clarity on why they're happening, as opposed to overwhelming exposition dumps.
Core gameplay: Return Halo to its roots
Perhaps the largest point of contention among Halo fans is the new style of gameplay. With the series nearing its 16th birthday, some fans argue that Halo should drastically change to avoid becoming stale. I would say that the majority, though, want Halo to return to its roots. One only has to look at the series' exponentially decaying mindshare since 2010 to see that the altering of Halo's mechanics has, at least in part, produced a negative impact. But I believe that 343 Industries can bring back the classic feel of Halo, while also satisfying fans that want new, fresh gameplay by designing Halo 6 as a modular experience.
The more modern Halo games changed the foundation mechanics themselves, the older games changed Halo by building upon that foundation with innovations in the sandbox and in map design. It is for this reason that I call it "modular."
Halo 2 and 3 innovated by "adding a module" onto the classic Halo formula. Think of vehicle boarding, man-cannons, or equipment items. Whereas Reach, 4 and 5 innovated by adding base traits like the ability to sprint, clamber up ledges, or by giving the player armor abilities. The fundamental difference between the two is that with modular design, there is significantly more room to work with. When you change a base mechanic for all players, every single map and element of your weapon/vehicle sandbox must change to fit around that alteration — because that alteration is made to the core mechanics of character control.
But when you make changes in the game's maps or sandbox, things that vary from match to match such as man-cannons or power-ups, a form of dynamic gameplay occurs. This form of emergent play helps the game and every match in it to feel fresh and new, while also retaining the core mechanics that make Halo, Halo. And the best part of it is, if players decide they don't like a certain change, the developer can change or remove it, and it will have a minimum impact on the game as a whole.
That wouldn't be the case if you were to, say, remove sprinting from Halo 5. Since sprinting is a core mechanic, removing it from Halo 5 would send ripples of issues throughout the game, as it's designed around that ability. This is why I think modular design for Halo is better than changing its foundation. Unlike altering core mechanics, innovation through sandbox and map design lets the developer choose where and how features are added, rather than being forced to make changes to every aspect of the game.
Next time we'll look at the user interface, gameplay features, and art, along with an in-depth critique of Halo 5's controversial REQ system.
Do you agree with me about Halo 5's issues and what Halo 6 will need to change to be successful? Let me know in the comments below. And if you don't own it, consider playing the latest Halo title and seeing how you feel:
Ditch the squads, return to basics, and tell a solid story. Do that and I'll be back on board.
Bring it to PC also
While on PC, they really need to do something that makes it work with Hololens. At least a tech demo - something.
They have to move back to Halo 2 Anniversary art style.
H2A/HW2 is my favorite Halo art style, 100%
Also having Cortana as the villain after her sendoff in Halo 4 was extremely dumb.
YES. That too. It was done so poorly and because of that it kind of killed Halo 4's ending impact :(
YES!!! This was sooo stupid. Cortana being a villain made zero sense. 343 really has only figured out how to ruin a franchise (do everything that pisses all of the fans off, it will work every time!)
Agree 100%. This, and playing as the Chief in only 4 of 10 missions (or whatever) was very disappointing. I don't care about Locke. The Master Chief, his story with UNSC, ONI, Cortana, Covenent, Halsey, and the other the Spartan II's is where it's at.
Everyone said the same about playing the Arbiter in Halo 2. So many complained at the time. Then funny enough, 10 years later loads saying they loved the game.
I seem to be the minority here, but I think it is great. I saw it coming early (even posted the idea in Waypoint months before release.) When MS decided to use Cortana as their desktop assistant it made no sense they would kill her off. I also think it is a pretty good chance she will be rehabbed by the end of Halo 6 now that it had been confirmed the Flood is back.
I liked Halo 5 story an all. The multiplayer is really, really deep. Support is fantastic as well. I can see where people were put off by the service to the players who read the universe and get everything 343 was doing. I loved it only bc I understood it. That being said, I'd like to see someone take the reigns from Chief eventually.
Chief is just a boring 1 dimensional shadow of what the character could have been. Hes just so damn boring and stale now.
I disagree. He's probably the best character in video game history. In terms of story development. From his childhood, to his unique leader ability. And everything he is ironically is because of Halsey.
Cortana's voice being used should have NO effect on the game's narrative. Most people who use Windows 10 don't play halo or even know or care about the link. Beyond that, if they did bring her back because of the digital assistant, why would they make her a bad guy? Why would MS want a key feature of their operating system to be a tyrannical overlord?
Because everyone loves a happy ending to a challenging Love story. By the end of 6, I fully expect we will see a reunited Chief and Cortana.
You really think they need you to tell them how to make a good video game? Yikes. The last halo game was just fine, just not enough Master C. 343i is doing a great job with the Halo franchise.
For you, sure. But how do you account for sales drop, player base drop?
It's not that easy to maintain any franchise for this long, as the original 'core' player base ages and younger ones need to be brought on board, it's quite tricky navigating the generation transition without alienating the longtime players - there will be some inevitable difficulty. Nearly all franchises experience this. Take Street Fighter for example, and the apparent 'decline' in the popularity of the fighting game genre from their peak glory days, or Tomb Raider and the entire 'reboot', or Final Fantasy and the transition from turn-based to real time action rpg, or even relative newcomers like Mass Effect, with Andromeda having to fill such large shoes and appeal to the existing core audience of the original trilogy - I'd argue that if MEA was a standalone game from an 'unknown' studio, it would have been received extremely well because it's actually a very good game. The Soul Calibur franchise experienced the same thing as well, with many longtime players claiming SC2 is the best ever, although SC3, 4, and 5 are all great games in their own right. Call of Duty Infinite Warfare is another great example - awesome game but the backlash from the existing core CoD audience was incredible! Now Marvel vs. Capcom seems to be in this situation judging from internet reviews of early Infinite gameplay builds (I play fighting games a lot :-)). This is not exactly a problem unique to Halo, it's just a struggle of transition between generations of players while trying to appeal to both old and new players.
I personally don't think the "this franchise is old" argument is valid when you have franchises like Pokemon, Star Wars, Star Trek, or Super Mario, all of which have been around for 30+ years and still find both success and a monumental following.
The old franchises you mention are typically single player solo games, no online multiplayer etc. That is a very different terrain and experience. Furthermore, have you consistently followed each and every release of these games, and has every single release been as successful as the previous one without any complaints from the core audience? Super Mario for one I know has not always had a perfect flat run (I'm a big fan, but I can't stand any of the 3D marios), but they have such a huge number of releases and so many flavors, that if you don't like version 10, just skip it and wait for version 11, while you can keep yourself entertained with version 9 or version 9a. We need to compare the Halo situation with typical online multiplayer based games (like CoD, or most combat games) to see it is a very common trend.
Pokémon thrives on multiplayer between players. And no, they haven't, but the common issue either any newer content (like Halo) is that it strays too far from the established formula.