Microsoft's upcoming brawler 'Bleeding Edge' is all I can think about

Bleeding Edge Screens
Bleeding Edge Screens (Image credit: Windows Central)

Ninja Theory joined Microsoft almost a couple of years ago now, as Xbox sought to increase and diversify its home-grown games portfolio. Ninja Theory is most recently known for Hellblade, which proved to be a surprisingly high-quality and stunningly cinematic adventure game on a relatively modest budget, something rarely done in the indie space.

Previously, Ninja Theory had worked on melee-oriented action games like DmC and Heavenly Sword, which at least on paper, correlates well to the studio's next game, Bleeding Edge.

Bleeding Edge is a multiplayer brawler where teams of four go head-to-head in a variety of objective-oriented battles. The game effectively revolves around a cyborg underground fight club of friends who pit their machines and body mods against each other in glorious combat, against the backdrop of a dystopian future. The premise is excellent, and the art design is stunning, but it's how the game feels in 2020 that has really gripped me. Bleeding Edge now sits among my most anticipated games.

Microsoft "service games" and cynicism

Source: Windows Central (Image credit: Source: Windows Central)

The immediate reaction to Bleeding Edge's reveal was mixed. While some lauded the game's vibrant art and unique character designs, many flocked to a knee-jerk reaction inspired by narratives against Microsoft's tendency to build service-driven games.

Source: Microsoft (Image credit: Source: Microsoft)

As a leader in cloud and subscription services, Microsoft has skewed towards live service games in the past, and many wondered if Bleeding Edge represented a departure from the single-player cinematic experiences of Hellblade. Ninja Theory was quick to address concerns, noting that Bleeding Edge was put together by a passionate team of just 25 developers, who are fans of MOBA-style titles and online PvP game types like World of Warcraft's arena system. And since then, we've had a glimpse at Hellblade II, by the way, which looks utterly stunning. This is what lead developer Rahni Tucker said to us last year at E3.

"So [our other team] focus on story-character experiences, but me personally, I'm more interested in building "gamey" games. I really like third-person action combat I wanted to do more of that. But at home, I play like competitive team games in my spare time. But yeah, Ninja Theory has two teams back at the studio, one working away on the type of stuff [fans] might be used to, this is not a change in direction for the studio. There's more than one thing that we're working hard on."

Bleeding Edge certainly isn't a super-duper unique concept. As mentioned, it takes cues from MOBAs like Smite and League of Legends (and it actually began life as a MOBA), and has some familiarity with other competitive arena games, with some cybernetic overtones that could be compared to Overwatch. However, it plays very differently to superficially similar games and has wormed its way into some of the most addiction-prone recesses of my brain.

Hey, Bleeding Edge is actually good

While I had some limited hands-on time with the game last year at E3 and during its alpha testing, it didn't really pinch me like it had in its recent closed beta in February 2020, exclusive to Xbox Game Pass subscribers. A coalescence of subtle tweaks has clearly elevated the way the game feels across the board.

A coalescence of subtle tweaks has clearly elevated the way the game feels.

I'm not sure what it is without being able to compare the game's pre-release builds side-by-side, which were months apart, but every aspect of the game felt more satisfying this time around. Healers felt a little less squishy, tanks felt a little less immortal, and melee combat felt generally tighter. Playing Nidhoggr, the death metal guitar axe-wielding cyborg, felt far more impactful than I remember, letting me snipe kills on healers while being able to survive long enough to set fire to tanks. I spent the vast majority of my time with Kulev, however, 'cus British.

Kulev is a mad scientist who imported his consciousness into a snake, but kept his dead body around in some sort of grotesque embalmed, voodoo-inspired state. Kulev can produce an area of effect healing abilities, and shield himself and allies from damage. Like any arena class-based brawler, keeping your healers alive is pretty pivotal to victory. Left unchecked, it was hard to find a situation Kulev was unable to mitigate, easily creating victory conditions for my teammates.

The "a-ha" moment for me came through in the video above, where I was able to pop Kulev's ultimate on an unsuspecting Gizmo player, taking command of their controls and forcibly making them commit suicide. It was equal parts hilarious and somewhat nostalgic of similar abilities from World of Warcraft of years past, where priests could mind-control enemy players off cliffs and into the lava. The environmental hazards in Bleeding Edge add a dose of tactical chaos that is all the more rewarding when utilized properly.

Rounding off the experience was the rewards screens, which let you know more about your performance in the match, complete with currency rewards for purchasing in-game cosmetics and soft modifiers for skills, allowing you to change up your playstyle. Each hero comes with two ultimates and a variety of abilities that can be tweaked to alter your experience or role in combat, giving Bleeding Edge broad potential for a complex, evolving metagame.

Can it hit the big time, though?

Source: Windows Central (Image credit: Source: Windows Central)

We're living in a post-Fortnite, post-Overwatch world, where both games have peaked. Still, both enjoy millions of passionate fans who are either still actively playing, yet continue to duck-in and duck-out to try out new updates, new features, and so on. Thus is the nature of online service games.

The idea of a relatively modest, 25-strong team taking on the likes of Smite and Overwatch seems like an underdog story in waiting. Yet, I wouldn't count them out at all. Bleeding Edge might ship relatively light on content compared to some of the other big established players in the space, but the fact it'll launch day and date into Xbox Game Pass on both console and PC will give it an instant audience.

I have no idea if Bleeding Edge will stand the test of time, but if lots of people find it as addictive as I do, there's a high chance.

Jez Corden
Managing Editor

Jez Corden is the Managing Editor for Windows Central, focusing primarily on all things Xbox and gaming. Jez is known for breaking exclusive news and analysis as relates to the Microsoft ecosystem while being powered by caffeine. Follow on Twitter @JezCorden and listen to his Xbox Two podcast, all about, you guessed it, Xbox!

9 Comments
  • I only managed to play through the tutorial in the closed Beta as I was basically working the whole weekend, but I liked what I played. I do have a feeling that this game is going to end up like Battleborn though, a great concept that just doesn't get picked up by the masses.
  • mm, I dunno. It's a different situation. Battleborn was tactically buried by Overwatch, and Battleborn was 30 FPS on consoles and had a really rough engine at launch in comparison. I think Bleeding Edge also has a very unique gameplay style that could give it an edge (lol), also Game Pass virality. I wouldn't count it out yet, but you may be right.
  • Oh, I really don't want to be right, but I'm worried I will be. Battleborn copped way too much flak by getting compared to a game that wasn't even the same genre. Bleeding Edge at least has its third person perspective to allow it to differentiate visually, but honestly people are going to just see it as a retread of Overwatch (and it's closer to Overwatch than Battleborn was) again. But yeah, I do agree that Game Pass will help this one a lot, being "free" (for those who want to criticise my usage here, go talk to a wall, it'll care more) if you are a part of that service at least means it'll get some decent player numbers and given that we know the gameplay is solid we can just hope that Ninja Theory keep pushing new content regularly enough to keep people interested.
  • Looks like fun, I tried it a bit and had a good time. Time will tell if it's a hit, but it's good that there are games like this, especially with the rock-solid backing from the new Microsoft gaming narrative.
  • This game took me by surprise. I don't normally like these sorts of games. Over watch I played for like a week with my friends and got bored. Plus I hated the loot box gambling system. But I ended up not being able to put this Bleeding Edge down. It is so different from all thr shooter multi games out there. Fantastic strategic combat. And real teamwork orientated game modes. I played over 15 hours across 2 days. And am convinced this will gather big steam and have a huge player base. This could even go 30 or 40 million players. It really has that potential. And no Microtransactions. Awesome.
  • You sounded totally opposite on the podcast. You were lukewarm at best.
  • That was mostly to do with wondering if it can stand the test of time, which I noted in the article. Did you read it? :P
  • I have never understood why those kinds of games are fun. I only find FPS type games engaging.
  • I used to love FPS. I grew up during the boom of FPS. Halo CE etc. I still love Halo among others. But FPS is becoming stale pretty fast these days. Platform titles, 3rd person combat titles like Devil May Cry are absolutely awesome. And Bleeding Edge is so much more fun than I have it credit for leading up to its launch. Genuinely surprised by how good it is.