Despite its big OpenAI push, Microsoft's Bing search market share decreases year-over-year

Bing Sinking into the Ocean
(Image credit: Windows Central | Bing Image Creator)

What you need to know

  • Bing is the biggest search competitor next to Google, despite having only roughly 7% of the market. 
  • This past year, Microsoft's big Bing partnership with OpenAI spooked Google investors to the point its stock price decreased. 
  • Despite the hype over the past year, Bing's search market share actually decreased year over year, according to share tracker StatCounter. 

I am an unashamed Bing user (okay, maybe slightly ashamed) — those Microsoft Rewards are just so damn good. Sadly for Microsoft, though, the general populace doesn't seem to care. 

Microsoft created something of a hype train at the start of 2023, as its partnership with OpenAI began to bear fruit. Microsoft has baked ChatGPT's human-like response chatbot into virtually all its products, with code support AI in Github to generative pictures in Microsoft Paint. The tip of the hype train revolved around Bing, however, which is Microsoft's under-loved and underutilized search platform. 

Using Bing and Windows Copilot (which is essentially just Bing), you can ask it to steal repurpose content from across the web in a single place. By stealing repurposing content from websites like Windows Central, Bing promised to save users time by eliminating the need to actually click through and support the websites Bing is stealing repurposing content from. However, the promise hasn't really lived up to reality. Bing is oftentimes just slower than simply clicking through to the website, and has a tendency to either censor or garble the information it's trying to steal repurpose. Too often I've found myself simply giving up on Bing, since it's often just quicker to go to the source. Perhaps other users are feeling similarly. 

(Image credit: Stat Counter)

According to search volume tracker Stat Counter, Bing's market share actually decreased half a percent year-over-year in the United States, from 7.4% to 6.9%, Google's share increased to 88% up from 86.7% last year, taking a little bit of search volume from virtually every other noticeable player. Microsoft Edge stole 1% of Google's Chrome web browser share, however, although it's still a drop in the ocean at just under 5.5% market share. So it's not all bad news, right?! 

These stats are relatively tiny and are likely within the margins for error, but so far, it doesn't seem like OpenAI is proving the disruptor Microsoft likely hoped it would be. It is, however, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars per day to run. So, there is that. 

Does Bing have a prayer?

The reality is that you could call these stats effectively flat, but to actually lose market share despite the massive ChatGPT hype injection isn't exactly encouraging. You could say it's still pretty early days in the world of generative AI, however. Bing and Windows Copilot have their uses, even if web search isn't necessarily one of them. 

Related: How to get started with Bing Chat

Google is currently embroiled in a massive anti-trust case in the United States, where regulators are arguing that it has abused its search monopoly to favor its own products, among other things. Microsoft has testified in the case, which saw CEO Satya Nadella effectively concede it was impossible to dent Google's market share. Google pays companies like Firefox, Apple, and Samsung billions of dollars to maintain its "default search" position on pre-installed browsers and apps, making it difficult for competitors to acquire the data necessary to improve search result relevancy. It's certainly possible that this court case could end up having more benefits for Bing and search competition than generative AI ever could, but the US FTC doesn't enjoy the kind of legislative powers that EU or UK regulators do. 

In any case, with Google's own "Bard" AI catching up to Bing's content theft repurposing algorithms quite rapidly, any chance that Bing had to dent Google's market share seems to have slipped away. Perhaps Microsoft should consult Bing AI on how to improve the desirability of its products.

Jez Corden
Co-Managing Editor

Jez Corden is a Managing Editor at Windows Central, focusing primarily on all things Xbox and gaming. Jez is known for breaking exclusive news and analysis as relates to the Microsoft ecosystem while being powered by tea. Follow on Twitter @JezCorden and listen to his XB2 Podcast, all about, you guessed it, Xbox!

  • Midi_Amp
    Ever since chatGPT integration, I actually use more Bing than Google to search for stuff. Google only points questions to a specific website or websites that might have answers to my question. Bing with ChatGPT interacts with me, if I'm looking for something specific, it will spark a discussion, that leads to other new findings.
    Reply
  • Jez Corden
    Midi_Amp said:
    Ever since chatGPT integration, I actually use more Bing than Google to search for stuff. Google only points questions to a specific website or websites that might have answers to my question. Bing with ChatGPT interacts with me, if I'm looking for something specific, it will spark a discussion, that leads to other new findings.
    I think Bing could and should create a healthy feedback loop between creators and users, but right now it's a race to the bottom. If Bing puts websites out of business, where will it get the answers from?
    Reply
  • Robin Sayer
    This article is probably showing a few things.

    1) Microsoft are notoriously bad at describing their own products. I use Bing search and Edge for everything, and it blows my mind - how poorly Microsoft promote that its business customers can search every work email, every work conversation, every meeting, every work document, every work news post or wiki page - all from within Bing. Yet I've never seen Microsoft promote that fact.

    2) Why search? Surely the idea Microsoft and the rest of us should be understanding - is that AI negates the need for search. So Bing is not a good measure, if AI is doing its job - wouldn't we see the total search market going down, and the use of Copilot for Windows, or ChatGPT 4 going up.
    I don't want to search any longer - I want CoPilot to search for me.
    So the uptick for people like me - wouldn't even show on these graphs
    Reply
  • Robin Sayer
    Jez Corden said:
    I think Bing could and should create a healthy feedback loop between creators and users, but right now it's a race to the bottom. If Bing puts websites out of business, where will it get the answers from?
    It's time for a change. something needs to give.

    Google, facebook and social media sites have already killed a lot of curated content creation in exchange for the opinion of the masses, thumbs up and likes.


    There has to be a better way to organise content on the Internet which doesnt scatter quite so much information around.
    The internet treats the world like its hundreds of billions of notice boards all over the planet - which you can magically find and read.

    Social media consolidated those notice boards into a fewer number of shared boards - which hang off of a particular topic (Reddit), person (facebook/twitter), movie (imdb), product (amazon).

    CoPilot is going to do the searching for you - but what I would like to see, is the AI being used to fact check, the AI to be constantly measuring the quality of content and comparing it.
    I want the AI working out what is content created by experts.

    What AI hopefully can do is separate opinion from facts. Although not if Elon Musk has anything to do with it.
    Reply
  • dave_456
    For me Bing chat and Github Copilot has replaced at least 50% of my web searches, probably way more. I really only do a traditional web search now when I do online shopping.

    Of course Bing chat and Github copilot searches would not show up in stat counters results.
    Reply
  • fabzo45
    Most people fail to mention the competition between ChatGPT and Bing AI itself. We have "Browse with Bing" capabilities on ChatGPT Plus, and believe me, it's actually better than using Bing AI itself. It's funny to see but vanilla GPT-4 on ChatGPT Plus has outperformed both Bing AI and Copilot Chat over and over again in my case. I don't mind paying $20/month as long as it works better for most cases.
    You guys can keep making up excuses, but we all know the reason why Bing AI doesn't take off. The reason is because everybody go straight to ChatGPT Plus.

    The relationship between Microsoft and OpenAI is hilarious because Microsoft gave so much money to OpenAI, and OpenAI is the only one benefitting from this relationship. What's the point for Microsoft to "build" on top of GPT-4 while vanilla GPT-4 is actually better than what they offer?
    Reply
  • Cmndr_Bytes
    fabzo45 said:
    Most people fail to mention the competition between ChatGPT and Bing AI itself. We have "Browse with Bing" capabilities on ChatGPT Plus, and believe me, it's actually better than using Bing AI itself. It's funny to see but vanilla GPT-4 on ChatGPT Plus has outperformed both Bing AI and Copilot Chat over and over again in my case. I don't mind paying $20/month as long as it works better for most cases.
    You guys can keep making up excuses, but we all know the reason why Bing AI doesn't take off. The reason is because everybody go straight to ChatGPT Plus.

    The relationship between Microsoft and OpenAI is hilarious because Microsoft gave so much money to OpenAI, and OpenAI is the only one benefitting from this relationship. What's the point for Microsoft to "build" on top of GPT-4 while vanilla GPT-4 is actually better than what they offer?
    Off hand I would say me not having to pay $20. a month. :-D
    Reply
  • GraniteStateColin
    Robin Sayer said:
    It's time for a change. something needs to give.

    Google, facebook and social media sites have already killed a lot of curated content creation in exchange for the opinion of the masses, thumbs up and likes.


    There has to be a better way to organise content on the Internet which doesnt scatter quite so much information around.
    The internet treats the world like its hundreds of billions of notice boards all over the planet - which you can magically find and read.

    Social media consolidated those notice boards into a fewer number of shared boards - which hang off of a particular topic (Reddit), person (facebook/twitter), movie (imdb), product (amazon).

    CoPilot is going to do the searching for you - but what I would like to see, is the AI being used to fact check, the AI to be constantly measuring the quality of content and comparing it.
    I want the AI working out what is content created by experts.

    What AI hopefully can do is separate opinion from facts. Although not if Elon Musk has anything to do with it.

    Robin, while separating opinion from facts sounds like the ideal, smart, rational people frequently disagree. While there is one correct answer to the capital of Mongolia or the pass completion rate of Tom Brady over his career, there isn't one "right" answer for many subjects like economics, physics, medicine, or controversial subjects like climate change. I think the larger danger is implying that there is a correct answer to any of these, because that strips people of their skepticism and diminishes curiosity (we're less curious about subjects with definitive answers), which is what drives discovery and advancement.

    I'm not sure that's Elon Musk's point, but I think it's at least part of it. There is great danger in just ascribing "expert" status to one or more sources. That's not to say someone teaching graduate economics out of MIT's Sloan School on the subject of inflation drivers isn't a more reliable source than some guy on Facebook, but "experts" are also frequently wrong, and that's OK -- science is built in the advances of the past, but it's never complete. Recall that at various points in time we "knew" ulcers were caused by stress (the scientist who originally proposed it was H. pylori was ridiculed), the shortest distance between two points in open space is a straight line (Einstein showed how gravity bends space), electrons were particles (quantum mechanics shows they're also waves), the arable land on the Earth could never generate enough food to support a billion people on the Earth (advances in farming techniques and technology blew past this), etc.?

    Skepticism and curiosity are more important than the "answer." They drive advancement. Suggesting a single answer is correct fosters mob mentality, which is terrible.

    I would prefer, and this would be a HUGE benefit of AI over traditional search (and Bing's AI chat does do this to some extent) would be to present the various theories and perhaps give some weighting to some over others in terms of how widely held they are (e.g., the majority of physicists believe that dark energy and its antigravity effects form at a constant rate as result of the universe expanding, but many believe that this rate has changed and will continue to change over billions of years).

    That way, we get the benefit of what the AI search does FAR BETTER than traditional search: gathering data from multiple sources and combining it into a single answer. Traditional search only shows individual points of data, which is a fundamentally different way to learn about a subject.
    Reply
  • GraniteStateColin
    Do StatCounter's search engine rankings include mobile? If we look at use on PC's (or the subset of just Windows PC's), does the same decline in Bing hold true, or could this decrease reflect a greater use of searching on mobile?
    Reply