We've reached something of a turning point for the MCU, otherwise known as the Microsoft Computational Universe. It's when the Windows 11 experience overlaps so heavily with Microsoft's Surface device ambitions that the two separate endeavors join forces for one glorious team-up launch on October 5, 2021 and are thereby inextricably linked from one another in the minds of consumers forevermore.
But there's more to it than that. Microsoft and its Chief Product Officer Panos Panay seem intent on bringing the differing facets of the company together to produce a more cohesive package. What are the implications of such actions?
Is Microsoft building a tight, all-encompassing ecosystem? Is it just trying to take a page from Apple's book without going to those extremes? We asked experts to weigh in.
Surface 2021, Windows 11, and the MCU
Microsoft didn't skimp with its 2021 Surface lineup. Not only did we get the rumored, leaked, and highly coveted Surface Duo 2 reveal, but also a whole host of other devices and hardware. And one thing was constant throughout all of these devices (barring the Duo 2): A love of Windows 11. Was this a sign that Microsoft has finally embraced a unified, ecosystem-minded approach for its products?
"I think Microsoft realizes it's fundamentally different from Apple," said Forrester Vice President and Principal Analyst J.P. Gownder. "It's an ecosystem of partners."
As to what that ecosystem meant on a practical level, Gownder explained the different parts.
"So I think it's a bit of a return by Surface to its origins as a demonstration product to galvanize the OEM partner ecosystem by showing off Windows 11, while also honoring that Surface will continue to be its own robust, independent product line," he said. "But it's not an Apple-style closed ecosystem."
He noted that Enterprise customers still have practical needs that Dell, HP, and Lenovo are better equipped to satisfy than Surface devices are, highlighting one more piece of evidence behind the claim that Microsoft's approach to ecosystems truly is focused on casting a broader net than Apple by emphasizing the partner element.
Not an Apple
Whether it's deliberately not trying to be or just can't manage the task, one thing's for certain: Microsoft is not Apple.
"Yes, Microsoft has been trying to build an OS + hardware ecosystem," said Gartner Research Director Mikako Kitagawa. "The lack of a phone OS is their weakness compared to Apple's ecosystem, so Duo is their effort to fill the gap. Still, there are many users with iPhone and Windows devices, meaning that having a phone OS does not necessarily increase the number of Mac users."
Gownder made similar comments with regards to the Duo not quite being the one-size-fits-all solution Microsoft may be hoping for. "I think Microsoft would love to become a player in high-end Android phones but they have a long way to go based on the 1.0 Duo device," he said. "It's more of an aspiration than an empire at this point!"
Caveats aside, there was an acknowledgment of a carefully crafted ecosystem, even if not all branches of it were viewed as winning the world over just yet. The one thing that experts across the board agreed on was that Microsoft's efforts were resulting in a unique interpretation of the interconnected technology concept.
"I do agree that Microsoft appears to be trying to create a more tightly integrated ecosystem that could be considered to be more like what Apple has created with iOS and MacOS," said Moor Insights & Strategy Senior Analyst Anshel Sag. "However, I think the thing to consider here is that Microsoft's goals across the board are to enable rapid creativity and productivity. I think Microsoft's vision is to remove barriers to productivity and creativity with this Surface experience and to give it the premium feel that Surface has always had."
Sag stated that he thought Microsoft's approach for Surface was ambitious, given the wide variety of users it was trying to win over.
Microsoft Surface strategy, in summary
At the end of the day, only Microsoft knows what its long-term plans are for Surface and Windows. But the evidence exists to suggest that the MCU is a real goal for the company and that it's intent on people loving its hardware as much as its world-dominating software.
While the company cares very much about Azure and its cloud efforts, it appears Windows and Surface are both getting a renewed sense of focus and attention from Redmond. This is resulting in a more cohesive picture of how all of Microsoft's endeavors relate to each other. Time will tell whether said relations grow tighter or if the net is truly being cast as wide as possible.
Robert Carnevale is the News Editor for Windows Central. He's a big fan of Kinect (it lives on in his heart), Sonic the Hedgehog, and the legendary intersection of those two titans, Sonic Free Riders. He is the author of Cold War 2395. Have a useful tip? Send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.
I don't feel like much of good substance came from these comments. If anything, I think the most significant statement was one that doesn't speak well to Microsoft's recent launch. That is: "'I think Microsoft realizes it's fundamentally different from Apple,' said Forrester Vice President and Principal Analyst J.P. Gownder. 'It's an ecosystem of partners.'" I think it's partially right, but not something that's reflected well throughout Microsoft's releases. The Surface Pro is still feels a bit unique in its market position. However, the Surface Laptop and Laptop Studio feel like Microsoft dying to get the kind of loyalty Apple enjoys, with the former all too fine with attacking its supposedly beloved partners. The Duo's price hike acts like it's trying to be a premium offering in its ecosystem, except it's in Google's. Every time they scare someone off (be it with the price tag or a compromise on a feature), they're turning people away from Microsoft entirely, not to a partner that benefits Microsoft. The Surface family has seemingly evolved into Microsoft's grasping at Apple's clout. I don't see anything about their moving in these markets that shows they're enabling their partners in a way that the Surface Pro really did seem to with Windows 8. The SLS isn't doing anything like that. The SPX didn't pave the way for anything exciting with Windows on ARM. The Neo had potential, but its entire ecosystem collapsed. I couldn't tell you how Microsoft's doing much to enable their partners. Maybe if the haptic touchpad were using an existing standard or doing something to move the market forward like MPP on touch displays, but it's yet another example of Microsoft seemingly telling their alleged partners "we'll do it ourselves, since you can't."
More like "If you won't do it, we will. Now get cracking!"
Microsoft isn't attacking their partners so much as reminding them they have to do some of the lifting. No more free rides as in the days of bloatware and adware crippling Windows for a few bucks. Or coasting for years with the same design.
HP seems to get it. Their new toys push the envelop in different directions than Surface, which makes them complementary and desirable.
Even with the second and third tier asian vendors you see useful products that go where Surface won't, even if it is cheap WinTabs, MiniPCs, or stick PCs. Never mind the value laptops and desktops lines.
Surface is the flagship focused on premium priced productivity but that's not the totality of the Windows universe. There is plenty of room for everybody willing to "sing for their supper".
The end result is a broader, more active ecosystem that reaches more consumers and more niches than any single company can.
Azure brings in big corporate money but MS isn't about to give up their control of personal computing and the money it brings in. Add in Gamepass and it is clear today's MS is as "hungry" as the MS of the 80's and 90's, just going about things more subtly.
They want it all but without riling up the feds.
So far it's working.
Duo is a great concept, but price point is at least $500 to high to gain real traction. It is not a "designers brand", that people will pay an exclusive premium for, to WOW their friends, like a flagship Apple. Consumers buy phones, NOT companies... different than SurfacePro. If they want to get any mass adoption, going to have to get it in the price in range of last year's Apple, and SWAPA.... If/when it becomes a "cool device to have", then they can get the $1500-2K price on next year's flagship.
For corporations and government employees this works maybe, but the concept of "ecosystem" for ordinary consumers is nowhere near the level of "just works" that Apple's computers or Xiaomi's IOT and smart home devices have created. On a daily basis, I use a Samsung phone, Apple iPad, Windows laptop, Sony wireless earbuds, Huawei smartwatch, lots of Xiaomi home devices, all connected to a Google Hub, and most importantly a library that is based on a local NAS server rather than the Cloud.
Can Microsoft offer that level of value and usability with their ecosystem for a non-business consumer?
AngelsAdvocate is absolutely right. Please bear in mind, though, that "corporations and government employees" are actually Microsoft's primary customers.
Get the best of Windows Central in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to Windows Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.