Skip to main content

EA wants to drastically change how it launches online games like Anthem

Anthem is a third-person shooter which was supposed to compete with established titles like Destiny 2, but due to its lack of content, performance issues, and broken loot system, it failed to gain much traction. According to a report by PC Gamer, EA admitted that Anthem failed to meet expectations, but the company is committed to making the experience better. In order to make sure Anthem's failures aren't repeated in the future, the publisher is making significant changes as to how it handles the launch of online titles.

Developer BioWare is mostly known for single-player experiences, so Anthem was a significant departure for the team. A report by Kotaku also outlined the culture problems faced by the team. EA's Andrew Wilson said the following during a recent earnings call.

The reality is, it's not just an EA challenge, it's an industry-wide challenge. You're moving from what was initially a BioWare game which would be somewhere between 40 and 80 hours of offline play to 40 to 80 hours of offline play plus 100 or 200, 300 hours of elder game that happens with millions of other players at scale, online. As games have gotten bigger, that system isn't working as well as it has done in years gone by. So what you should expect from us is that it's not just about changing the development processes in the game... but it also comes down to changing how we launch games. You should expect that we'll start to test things like soft launches — the same things that you see in the mobile space right now. And it also comes down to changing how we communicate with players. Our entire marketing organization now is moving out of presentation mode and into conversation mode, and changing how we interact with players over time. We think that we're in a really good position for this — I think this gets really hard if you don't have scale to do this, and so we feel very good about it... over time we hope that we can lead from the front and help other developers and publishers change the way they do things as well.

While "soft launches" will allow the developer to test new ideas, the problem Anthem faced was the lack of leadership and direction at BioWare. Additionally, Respawn Entertainment released Apex Legends without any major leak or public test. Maybe EA should model its online games on that.

What do you think could help EA in the future? What do you want Anthem to do to bring players back? Let us know.

Excellent and affordable Xbox accessories

Up your Xbox experience with one (or all) of these budget accessories, all of which are approved by the gamers of Windows Central.

PowerA Play & Charge Kit for Xbox One (opens in new tab) ($15 at Amazon)

This charging kit keeps your Xbox One wireless controllers juiced up, and it offers batteries for two controllers. At just $15, this is hands-down our favorite budget charging companion.

ElecGear 4 Port USB Xbox One S Hub (opens in new tab) ($19 at Amazon)

This brilliant little USB splitter hub attaches perfectly to the side of your Xbox One S console. It's ideal for use with chargers, controllers, headsets, and more.

Controller Gear stand (opens in new tab) ($13 at Amazon)

Proudly display your Xbox gamepads with this stylish and functional stand. The licensed design is minimalist and black, and it has a hidden storage compartment, making the price of $13 a real steal.

Asher Madan handles gaming news for Windows Central. Before joining Windows Central in 2017, Asher worked for a number of different gaming outlets. He has a background in medical science and is passionate about all forms of entertainment, cooking, and antiquing.

7 Comments
  • The way I see it when a company the size of EA can spend hundreds of millions for salaries and bonuses towards their C-Class Employees ( CEO's and the lot ) they can as well afford to wait for their customers' money until the game they've se(n)t into production has reached the state of what was formerly known "Gone Gold" or just plain ready to ship in what the consumer would recognize as a ready to be shipped state. I for one will not buy any soft-launched game from anyone else but a low budget Indie Developer in actual need for my support to bring his idea to fruition.
  • I wouldn't even buy a soft-launch for an indie developer after Minecraft's official launch.
    MS buying Mojang has been the best thing to ever happen to that game
  • Yes, thank God for MS bought the studio and introduced microtransactions in the game... :)
  • "soft launches" or more accurately "you get it earlier if you buy a more expensive version or subscription plan". For anthem they had 3 different release dates based on what version you bought or what subscription service you had.
  • It's a little unfair comparing Anthem to Apex Legends.
  • if the game was good, then the launch wouldn't matter so much. people would want to play it and keep playing it regardless of how it launched.
  • Soft launch?
    They haven't got it. Instead of finding the reason Anthem failed, they are talking about reducing risk of loss by offering half baked games. This is could be horrible for consumers...