Loot crates in Star Wars Battlefront II ruin what could be a great game

I put it down to a beta bug, but I noticed that classes that I hadn't even played were higher level than the ones that I had been playing. I figured this must be a display issue, or progression registering incorrectly, alas no. It's a by-product of what could be the most aggressive, pay-to-win micropayment strategy ever seen in a modern, premium-priced competitive shooter.

DICE, please rethink this (or give us clarification).

So, what's the problem?

Battlefront II is a multiplayer first (and third) person shooter set in the Star Wars universe, for those who don't know. The first game was lambasted for being shallow, lacking content, and ultimately feeling like a bit of a cash-in on the license, despite the faithful recreation of the franchise's most iconic characters and settings. I accepted it for what it is, being a Star Wars fan, and enjoyed it quite a bit at the time, despite the silly arcade-style power-up tokens and boring wave-based missions.

Star Wars Battlefront II was supposed to be a response to all the negative feedback absorbed by the game's developer, DICE, and publisher, EA, who is widely regarded as one of gaming's biggest offenders of free-to-play mechanics in premium titles. EA hasn't been shy to note how much better Battlefront II is than its predecessor, citing the additional map count, content, and full-blown single-player campaign. But considering the micropayment strategy in Battlefield 1 was, by and large, for cosmetic bonuses, I had hope that EA had discovered a happy medium between honest-to-goodness gameplay balance and gambling micropayment crates. How naïve of me.

In Star Wars Battlefront II, the entirety of both cosmetic, and gameplay progression, revolves around randomly generated loot crates. This is why some of my character classes had higher progression than the ones I'd actually been playing. The random number generator (RNG) decided it for me.

As you play matches in Battlefront II, you're rewarded with Galactic credits which can be spent on, you guessed it, loot crates. The crate options in the beta offer rewards for standard troopers, hero classes which can only be spawned in-game at certain times, and starfighter rewards for the game's quite honestly incredible space combat mode. If these crates were purely cosmetic, they would be absolutely fine, but unfortunately, they directly and dramatically impact gameplay.

Battlefront II could very well be pay-to-win

Battlefront II's star cards are basically character customization options, affording you new abilities and passive buffs. The "Resourceful" booster card for the Officer class gives you a 10% recharge speed increase, with upgrades moving up to a whopping 28%. The booster and ability cards level up as you accrue duplicate cards, and they can be upgraded manually in exchange for "crafting parts," which appear in loot crates randomly across the board in tiny amounts.

I've been playing all weekend, and have amassed a ton of cards... for the Officer class, which I don't play. Including some "Epic" cards that grant huge bonuses. The classes I do play, namely Assault and Heavy, are far lower level, with weaker abilities, simply due to bad luck.

What can I do to side-step this bad luck? Well, EA could ask me to spend real money of course. Buying as many loot crates as I need to get the abilities I want, either using crafting parts or waiting until the RNG falls on my side. People who would buy the most loot crates on day one will have a significant advantage over those players that don't, which is depressing because the underlying game seems supremely amazing.

So, again, why is this a problem?

Star Wars Battlefront II puts its crate menu upfront and center, right there on the main menu. It also tries to nudge you into purchasing with a free crate every day. By tying the entire basis of progression to the crates, it further incentivizes payment. Every time you're defeated in combat, Battlefront II shows you which star cards were used to defeat you as if taunting you for having bad cards.

Star Wars Battlefront II isn't the most hardcore and balanced competitive game, especially when you factor in things like super-powered Hero classes and the like.

It's just saddening because the game underneath all of this gambling greed seems truly incredible.

However, the fact these RNG boxes are placed front and center, in a game many younger Star Wars fans will be picking up this holiday season incentivizes and rewards compulsive, financially reckless behavior, no different from casinos which carry a strict 18 age-rating (and higher in some places). Even without arguing the morality of these gambling mechanics which are hardly different than a jackpot slot machine complete with flashing lights, the progression system is just unrewarding. Why is my Officer class far more highly progressed than my other classes which I enjoy playing more?

This also contributes to a horrifying precedent that other games like Forza Motorsport 7 and Middle-earth: Shadow of War have pushed this year, where gameplay-modifying gambling crates are becoming the norm in premium, $60 AAA games.

Giving DICE the benefit of the doubt

Before we grab our pitchforks, there are a few things worth noting. First and foremost, this is a beta. I've seen rumors that Battlefront II's final build will have card packs specific for each class, allowing you to randomly focus on the progression of specific heroes and kits, rather than rely on the chaotic progression we have now.

I also couldn't find firm evidence that star cards will be offered for real money, although it's more than fair to assume they will be until proven otherwise. Loot crates are big money, and the fight against them is ultimately lost. It's the implementation that is problematic here, which seems predatory and manipulative.

This story is exploding across the internet right now, so it won't be very long until DICE and EA clarify or even roll back some of the more aggressive systems at play here. Again, maybe I'm just being naïve. Ultimately, it's just saddening, because the game underneath all of this gambling greed seems truly incredible.

Star Wars Battlefront II launches on November 17th, 2017 on Xbox One, PS4, and PC, for $60.

Jez Corden
Managing Editor

Jez Corden is the Managing Editor for Windows Central, focusing primarily on all things Xbox and gaming. Jez is known for breaking exclusive news and analysis as relates to the Microsoft ecosystem while being powered by caffeine. Follow on Twitter @JezCorden and listen to his Xbox Two podcast, all about, you guessed it, Xbox!

28 Comments
  • DO. NOT. LIKE.
  • This is not the revenue stream you're looking for
  • Admit it! You wrote the story just so you could use this comment, didn't you? :)
  • It's a trap
  • This is only good for those who don't have the time to play after work
  • Loot crates...loot crates everywhere  :(
  • Vote with your wallet, say NO!
  • Wallet voting has been hacked by a foreign super power, that rose to power by legendary loot crates. For a fee of $19.99, we can level up Wallet Voting to Secure Wallet, formely Microsoft Pay, but only for a litmited time as the voting window may close and Secure Wallet may be renamed or cancelled due to low usage. Regardless, for $29.99, you can secure a spot in Wallet Voting now, with 10% more vote that what we offered when we first started typing this comment. This deal is only available for 47m 5s.
  • One of the reasons why I stop playing Halo 5. 
  • But with Halo 5, you will never get duplicates. Single use cards, sure, but RNG was forgiving for players who wanted to reach the end game.
  • ANY game that costs $60 shouldn't have any form of micro payments
  • Pretty much my view.
  • I don't play multiplayer myself, and I assume this won't affect the campaign? If this is correct, I may still look at it. Either way, they won't be picking up a dime from me outside of the actual cost of the game.
  • I hate crates what a way to ruin a game. Tf2 did it right but EAs money grab is ridiculous. How can we kill micro transactions as a gaming trend?
  • I'm writing to my MP to discuss getting with microlootgamblingcrates to be 18-rated for gambling mechanics.
  • 18 rated would be still to low in my opinion.
  • I hope you are. Pretty lousy behaviour. I even think China bans this stuff.
  • True! If you get a valuable item you need to pay taxes on it too!
  • I just hope they don't roll this b.s over to the final release. If your going to spend $60 / £60 on a AAA game, loot crates and micro payments should have no integration in game play progression whatsoever. I get it that studios need to make money, but this is just beyond disgusting. Plus when you consider with digital copies they pretty much have no over heads unlike with physical copies. Just no. Any Studio that wants to force micro transactions on gamers for Gameplay progression is getting a auto boycott from me. I'm fine with cosmetic upgrades, but game play progression? Nope. Line drawn.
  • Awful, really awful. I hope this keeps thinking people from buying it. But it's starting to become a trend. Man, EA is just garbage, I'm glad I haven't bought a game from them in ages!
  • This is not how you earn long term from an online game, they should make the game free, turn the content into purchasable elements instead since thats how your create a trap for its consumers.
  • No surprise, Battlefield 3 you could pay to unlock everything you normally had to grind to unlock. Battlefield 4 decided to give most weapon attachments via random crates, which of course you could pay for. Most new games are filled with micro transactions that increase your odds of winning. I haven't invested in a new console or video card in over 6 years now because most of the games are pay to win these days. I miss the glory days of gaming before DLC.
  • it just buids a gambling mentality. "I pay and I can be greatly rewarded" how are EA ethically ok with this?
  • Ethics and business don't mix.
  • very fair point - well, when the next generation cant afford to buy EA titles because they're out gambling and in debt. then they will suffer.   It's just a waiting game now.
  • @Sin Ogaris. Ethics and business do mix, it depends on implementation and perspective.
  • Wow.  I was definitely going to buy Battlefront II, but if they release it like this I wouldn't even touch it with your bargepole.  
  • After the flip-flop that Turn 10 did following the VIP fiasco, it seems the studios are listening.