What you need to know
- Google asked a judge from the U.S. Justice Department's ongoing antitrust case to make Microsoft share documents related to the case.
- Microsoft claims that Google's request is unreasonable and burdensome.
- Google served a subpoena to Microsoft about documents regarding Bing, Internet Explorer, and Edge three months ago.
Microsoft is a key player in the U.S. Justice Department's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against Alphabet's Google. According to a court filing that was unsealed on Thursday, July 30, 2021, Google asked a judge hearing the case to make Microsoft share documents related to Microsoft's Bing, Internet Explorer, and Edge browser.
The filing claims that Microsoft refuses to search the files of 19 executives. Google says that the files in question are relevant to its defense (via Bloomberg). Microsoft was served a subpoena by Google over three months ago (via Reuters)
"In particular, there are nineteen Microsoft employees who held important positions relating to activities at the core of this case but whose files Microsoft refuses to commit to search at this time," says Google in the filing.
Microsoft issued a separate filing that calls Google's request burdensome and unreasonable. The filing from Microsoft explains that the company is willing to gather documents from 27 people. Google called for documents related to 28 additional individuals, bringing the total to 55.
According to Microsoft, Google hasn't provided "specific reasons" why the files are relevant to the case.
Google claims that the executives in question worked in several areas that are related to Microsoft's search engine and search advertising businesses.
Microsoft and Google had a truce for several years regarding regulatory complaints and lawsuits. That truce was not renewed, which is evident by recent activities from both companies.
Sean Endicott is the news writer for Windows Central. If it runs Windows, is made by Microsoft, or has anything to do with either, he's on it. Sean's been with Windows Central since 2017 and is also our resident app expert. If you have a news tip or an app to review, hit him up at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Essentially, Google is after more on information on people. Hardly surprising. Microsoft should have said that Google needs to provides the grounds upon which it believes these documents are relevant. Because if a company or individual can't provide legitimate reasons (grounds) for claims then that company or individual has no leg to stand on in court. Thus, the time wasting case be thrown out.
I wish Microsoft would just make its own version of YouTube and Twitter with the idea that you pay a monthly subscription so you're not spied on or have your personal information sold to whoever and that could be their selling point. Start them out small and see how big they can grow
Such a cry baby
Get the best of Windows Central in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to Windows Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.