iOS6 Safari currently beats out Windows Phone 8 for HTML5 features
Internet Explorer 10 is good but is it the best?
Although Windows Phone 8 is still a few months away from release, it doesn’t mean we can’t start to gather information about it or one of its main new features: Internet Explorer 10.
One area though that IE10 seems to be behind ever so slightly is HTML5 compatibility and specifications. This is a tough area to measure because HTML5 is not set in stone yet for specific features—it’s in flux, there is debate and there are proposals.
IE10 takes the top spot in SunSpider
One of those measurements is found at HTML5test.com and luckily for us it looks like someone recently sampled a Windows Phone 8 device running IE10. Due to the grey areas of what HTML5 actually means, they have divided the test up into three areas: Official, Related and Experimental.
'Official' are just what they sound like—HTML5 specifications that are approved. 'Related' are ones that were at one time included but have been dropped or replaced and 'Experimental' are proposed specifications that have a chance of becoming accepted.
HTML5Test has iOS 6 beating Windows Phone 8
In this regard, IE10 on Windows Phone 8 performs admirably well scoring 300 plus 6 Bonus points (awarded for audio-video support not specified). That is out of a possible 500 points plus 15 Bonus points. Android 4.0 (
JellyBean Ice Cream Sandwich) gets a score of 280 + 3 Bonus points while Apple’s iOS 6 browser gets an impressive 360 + 9 Bonus points. Interestingly, IE10 for desktop received 319 + 6 Bonus showing that at their current stages, the two versions of IE10 are still slightly different.
The areas where IE10 was lacking in comparison to iOS 6 are the following:
Official HTML5 specifications
- MPEG-4 Support
- PCM audio support
- Embedding custom non-visible data
- Hidden attribute
- Input types: date time, date, month, week, time, date-time-local, keygen
Related HTML5 specifications
- Server-sent Events
Experimental HTML5 specifications
- Web Audio API
It’s hard to put that into real-world experience but going by pure specifications of officially supported HTML5 features, it looks like iOS 6 beats out IE10 in Windows Phone 8. Does that mean everyday users will actually notice? We’re not too sure as some of these specifications may be niche. But having said that, it’s still better to have more official specifications than less.
Perhaps even more interesting is the fact that BlackBerry 10, which is far from being complete, had the top score of 447 + 10 Bonus points, crushing everyone else. Perhaps we shouldn't count RIM out just yet.
Wait...is that a BlackBerry we see?
Although IE10 may be behind iOS6, it trounces the current IE9 for HTML5 on Windows Phone 7.5
Of course all of these numbers can change as official browsers come out so we’ll have to revisit these numbers again in the fall. To our browser and standards mavens out there—do you think these results matter much? Sound off in comments.
Source: HTML5test; Thanks, Paulo O., for the tip
Windows Central Newsletter
Get the best of Windows Central in your inbox, every day!
Daniel Rubino is the Editor-in-chief of Windows Central, head reviewer, podcast co-host, and analyst. He has been covering Microsoft since 2007 when this site was called WMExperts (and later Windows Phone Central). His interests include Windows, laptops, next-gen computing, and for some reason, watches. Before all this tech stuff, he worked on a Ph.D. in linguistics, watched people sleep (for medical purposes!), and ran the projectors at movie theaters because it was fun.
You have ads on this very page that are made in Flash and pay your salary.
+ Save articles for off-line reading
+ Text reflow
+ One press tabbed browsing
I really hate speed comparison when IT IS SO MARGINAL in real world use difference. Mili second difference ? Give me a break.
Any developer worth there salt knows that is not the current reality and while we can start to implement some HTML5/CSS3 specific features today it would be irresponsible not to have fall backs for users who dont' have access. You see experimental stuff on porfolio site, not in production.
So basically the chance of you going to a "major" site and not being able to use it with IE10 are very small. The pages will be usuable if they were developed using standards. You just might not get the extra "cherry" on top so to speak.
I know Microsoft has billions of revenue and much of it poured into R&D. What I wonder is despite all "many teams", do the teams think the features ? And despite the many teams, why features in beta were taken out and has never come back until now, Tango ?
In conclusion, Microsoft focus on things that are important, but also forget on more important things such as, user experience in ease of use.
369 on Chrome on Android 4.1.1.
All mobile browsers are more than good enough nowadays, can't wait to try IE10 in action on WP8!
If just comparing html5 scores on stock browsers, BB10 has a score of 447. While that is awesome, but does it mean much to the average consumer? no. A reliable, and speedy browser with great compatibility with most websites is more important. Yes, html5 may play a part in that, but so does a lot of other things.
Know there are a lot of devs out there that are still butt-hurt about IE6 but if your actually keep up with the industry you know that IE9 is very standards compliant and fast. And lets not talk about experimental features because those don't belong in a production environment anyway.
Anybody who develops web aspps knows that HTML5/CSS is a moving target and that if the specifications were "finalized" we would have less of a disparity in support between the major browser makers.
Js and rendering speed is important, other tests are "rumors" (and ie10 is not complete too) ;)
In WM7.5 this is not possible (open/play is the only option).