There is very little debate on the Nokia Lumia 1520 being a large Windows Phone. Its 6 inch screen is massive compared to other Windows Phones. But is it fair to consider the largeness of the Lumia 1520 a "con" (as in pros and cons)?
WPCentral Forums member Rawliglat x poses the question in a recent forums discussion taking the position that the Lumia 1520 is simply designed for consumers looking for a bigger screen. The larger size of the 1520 should not be considered a con any more than the smaller size of other Windows Phone should be considered a con.
We do note in our review of the Lumia 1520 that the Windows Phone may not be for everyone due to its large size, recognizing that size is more of a personal preference than necessarily a "con". Personally, while an attractive Windows Phone I found the Lumia 1520 too large for my taste but not a "con" in the sense that the size takes away from the phone.
But what do you say? Should the 6 inch screen of the Lumia 1520 be considered a con or is the size simply a characteristic of the Windows Phone that may not appeal to everyone?
Feel free to jump over the WPCentral Forums discussion and share your thoughts.
- Forums Discussion - Con or Sheer Stupidity?
Reader comments
Is it fair to consider the size of the Lumia 1520 as a con?
Pages
My 2 cents... 6" is not a con IF you can buy the next smaller screen size, say 5", and with same flagship specs. Unfortunately you cannot at AT&T. With exclusive specs and sizes at different carriers it becomes a CON. Case in point, I'm an AT&T customer, 1520 too big for me but desire 5" 1080p screen WP. Next available WP becomes 930 (not available in N.A. for all AT&T LTE bands) or ICON (have to switch carriers). So the con becomes American marketing. Ex-pat to Europe or AsiaPac and con goes away... carrier exclusivity not an adopted means there.
So is it the phone size the con or the carrier offerings the real con issue?
It is definitely not a "con". If you don't want a 6" phone, then don't buy one. It has its drawbacks, but I cannot go back to a smaller phone.
The Zoolander reference is spot on!
Most comments I have read on this blog are concerned with screen resolution, gaming abilities, etc. So I would like to address the "phone" functions of this phone. Yes, I get looks when I hold it to my ear. But that is fine--if the occassional scoffer knew what I know they would be using the 1520. The reception is good. Call quality is excellent. Speakerphone is loud and clear both on my side and the caller's. It is TRULY bluetooth headset compatible--it reads my texts back to me before asking for my permission to revise or send them. It is COMPLETELY handsfree and I was unable to have that on the Androids I have used. With them, I had to look at the screen to read the text before sending it. Voice commands are accurate the majority of the time. It functions superbly as a phone--that has always been foremost in my mind when purchasing a mobile device. The screen--well, it is quite an added benefit and it speaks for itself.
Definite plus for me. Unlike most people I truly avoided the mobile phone craze which in a way gave me piece of mind. The 1520 was really the first phone that grab my attention. The size comes in handy for me numerous times a day it has me made way less dependent on my kindle fire hdx when it comes to checking e-mail, rss feeds etc and whenever flipboard gets their stuff together my kindle fire hdx probably will regulated to magazine reading etc. Long live the 1520.
Having a yellow 1520 after owning a yellow 620, all phones became small!!! Hahahah
I love using my 1520. The only problem I encountered with it is when I make calls and I forget to bring my headset. After a few minutes of placing it on my ear, it became painful to carry.
I have 925,1020,520, HTC M8, and now the 1520. And I love ❤ them all but I seem to always do back to my 1520. Love the screen but at times it is too big for one hand. Wish nokia/MS would make a dedicated software update for the 1520 like snap,and adjustable screen size for one hand
Its not con, m eager to buy this 1520 in future if I have made some money, seriously I feel its like an investment with high end returns!!
I had Lumia 925 for my daily driver for some time and I thought it was big at 4.5 when I first got it, but now I have been using Nokia 1520 for a month (thanks to Microsoft store give away) . First impartation was this is a mini tablet not a phone however its is light weight and thin so I said to myself l will give it a try and after a week or so I got so used to it that when I picked up my Nokia 925 I felt like picked up an i-phone (felt really small). Yes it’s not for everyone, Yes cannot do everything with one hand like I did with my Lumia 925 but whether the size is a con or sheer stupidity? Definitely NOT!!! It’s like wanting a sedan or an SUV.
I think it makes a big difference on your hand size. The 1520 has a big screen. But, it is very thin! My wife has an iPhone and she has much smaller hands and is happy with it! iPhones are very hard for me to see and use because they are so small. One comment I agree with is 4.3 inches is the starting size. Then the screens should go up from there!
I personally hate this new phablet trend....I've come to terms with 4.5" in my Lumia 920. What happen with catering to the Motorola V3 type of consumer with a flagship phone? Why was the Lumia 930 a 5" phone?
I could do with 4.5" or even a 4.7" if they reduce the bezel size by putting the buttons on the screen. I need a sleek flagship windows phone, not an elephant. Too bad the trend is against my personal preference.
I think it's a PRO as it gives the consumer the choice just as Android users...I currently have the 1020 which I love...but will be moving to the 1520 in a bit over a month BECAUSE I want the bigger screen!!
Yes defnetly too much size. I just feel awkward to use in my hands at the showroom while using this phone.... 5inch is good enough
The problem is allowing carriers exclusivity. The Icon is basically the smaller version of the 1520 but its only on Verizon here in the States. I love the 1520 but I think the perfect size would be 5.5 in.
The only "con" as far as I can see is the poor availability of the 1520 here in the UK. It's exclusive to Vodafone and I've been into several stores and they've not even heard of it, yet alone stock it. Since I'm not with Vodafone, it's not even an option for me. I don't know why Nokia continue to shoot themselves in the foot like this. Hopefully, now that they're under Microsoft's direct control, these handsets will be pushed more openly and readily across carriers.
Yes it's fair.
It looks ridiculous when people make phone calls with Phablets. And I consider my 928 to be way to large already. I wish Nokia made a good phone on a "snall form factor" like a Lumia 925 the size of a Samsung Focus.
I just got a ferrari... It got only one con: its too fast... R we really having this discussion here?!
Its definitely a con in a few scenarios, and deciding how often you'll be in these situations is going to influence how you decide that the device you buy fits your requirements. Simple. For 90% of the things I use my phone for, the size of the 1520 is a plus. For the other 10%? I bought a cheap HTC 8s for nights out when I don't want the bulk. Does 80% of the things my 1520 does but at half the size.
The keyboard size will shrink with 8.1. I felt the same way, but with the preview for developers, everything is improved. So much better.
well it depends on what you want when getting the device, for me 6" is a wee bit too large i have a 925 and its perfect but its not a con because for the person needing a larger screen what do they get? long and short of it is its all preference based.
I have HTC 8X and Lumia 1520 both are great and the size will matter in many ways...for ebook reading bigger size are better and for sms and calls smaller are better but both are good!
It's a con as far as I see it as I have no interest in phablets. I took one look at the screen-size and looked no further. I only want a top-end / flagship mobile phone NOT a phablet.
No.
Been using the 1520 since January and I love the screen size! It's not really massive, when you think about it. And I love taking pictures with it. :)
If we're talking about the cons of the 1520, it's the lack of support for USB 3.0 and the lack of 64GB and 128GB options for the internal storage...
Remember when people prefered the smallest phone possible? And seemingly larger phones were labeled "bricks" and weren't cool
Lol yeah, the Motorola wings and the Panasonic gd55 come to mind.
It's a preference not a con, some like large screens hence why OEMs are still making large screen phones. Others prefer smaller screen phones..(so do I) though I don't see not many high end flagships being under 5" anymore.
4.7" is ideal to hold.
5" is a max for me. 4.7 optimum! Of course i am no basketball player...
Posted via the WPC App for Android!
Just solve the touch sensivity issue. I love this phone but it's making me wanna sell it
What was the issue and how did you solve it?
IMO, its not a con.
But some people say it is and some say it isn't.Actually if someone has small hands then it will be a con for him.
I change from 920 to 1520 and will never go back to anything smaller than 920.
The screen isn't too big. It's irrelevant. What's too big is the case around it. If I can't find a quad core 3GBram 1080p Windowphone that is comparable to the size of the 925 by fall I'm going to go back to the iPhone.
The ONLY thing that is keeping me from moving from my 920 to a 1520 today is AT&T's disabling of Qi wireless charging for the device. (Yes, I know I can add a cover to add the feature, but that also adds bulk to an already large phone.)
What if Nokia remains the Lumia 1520 dimension but with smaller screen 4.3inch? Thus, they can add a lot of things infront like a better speaker akin to HTC Boom.
4.3 might look silly. I held up my wife's s4 because I put Hero glass and a new case on it and I wanted to compare with my Nilkin glass. What a difference. The size from 6" to 5" would be plenty of a downsize to add Boom speakers.
I m a Tech. Writer and for me 1520 is my dream phone. I wanted a bigger screen with extra gigs of storage space with a long battery backup. And I m completely in love with 1520. It's all about one's preference. It is never a con for me. Browsing, reading, gaming and movie watching experience are better when done with a bigger screen. It is convincingly slim considering its screen size. It can be handled with one hand. It does fit perfectly in my trouser pockets.
Now when I use a 4.2 or 4.5 inch screen, I feel things have become smaller thesedays. I cannot revert to 4.5 inch screens anymore.
1520 is my perfect phone that I was looking for all these years. I don't have any cons despite the size.
Bigger much better.
To the contrary, its size is what makes it the most kick ass phone on the planet. Bar none.
Rawliglat x is right on the money. The size can be a con if a person is reviewing it as an unknown or is evaluating the pocket'ability neither of which makes any sense.
It is downright glorious as a phablet, but mockingly big as a phone - since most people use smartphones as internet platforms and generally make use of headphones/BT when making calls the "too big" statement is born out of ignorance if you ask me.
I for one enjoy being able to read actual webpages without needing to zoom constantly rather than the horrendous mobile versions that contains less than a twitter feed.
For me it is great. I went to buy my wife a 1320 and she disliked the size.
There's just no good way to use wife and size in the same sentence without it leading to some sort of joke lol
I find the Note 3 is the limit in size for me. As the 1530 is just that bit too big. I would buy the 1530 today if it was the same overall size of the Note 3.
So sticking with my 920 until the 930 appears.
I have a 1520 and it is the norm foe me and I could not think of my windows phone experience on a smaller screen. I understand that this phone could be to large for some but once you live with it for some time the size grows on you.
Well I cant think of going back to a smaller size phone only.but as some said there should have been a 5inch flagship with every feature 1520has unlike icon/930which skips on certain imp areas like glance,SD card.
All the ones who have tried my phone (Android users) got pretty impressed by the amazing screen. And all of them thought the screen size was not too big. Of course its big, but you get used to it pretty quick. The "con" in this is that I probably can't go back to a smaller screen size anymore :-/
Definitely not a con but yes, most people doesn't buy it due to its large size and THEIR handling problems!
A personal con yes
NO. it's not a con. I have the Nokia 1520 and the iPhone 5S. I Love both for different reasons, and i Love the size of each. 6" isn't too big. But, I think 4" is too small, but I don't consider it a 'con' becasue some people actually think the 4" is too large and prefer the 3.5" that was on iphone 4S.
The Nokia 1520 fits fine in anything but skinny jeans. I have no trouble holding or using the 1520. Love the size.
The first feature I was looking when I was considering the purchase of a phone was its large size. Never trade it for anything smaller.
Very little bezels and a 5 or 5.5 screen would make say wow. Feels like a smaller device. like the new g3
I had an iPhone 5 and liked it, but was an early fan of Windows Phone so made the switch back, this time to a 1520. Can't stand the smaller phones now. 8.1 on the 1520 makes it even harder to consider going back to iPhone.
I'm 6'3"... it fits me as well as an iphone fits somebody a foot or more shorter than me.
I wonder what all those people who bought a Samsung Note would say? I think it's got it's place just like other phones. I have Samsung Ativ S and it's a good size, but I still have my HD7 and a Nokia 710 both running WP 7.8. I think the 710 is still an awesome phone (they should really make a 710 for WP 8.1.) What I would like to see is a tough WP 8.1 like the Casio Commando. Truly an awesome phone in whatever size. Anyone from Casio listening in.
If it actually worked correctly it wouldn't be a con. As it is, this phone is sitting on my counter. I can't take the phantom taps, or worrying about it exploding due to the heat.
Is this really a "does size matter" discussion?
Now there is an even bigger phone rumour called Winstron Tiger! 6.45!
I love all the hating going on here over such superficial subjective features of modern society idols of choice. Maybe I've been in the idol worshiping game longer than most here but I've long come to accept that nothing I buy will ever be perfect especially phones.
My 1020 has flaws that irritated me before I bought it, but once I did and began taking amazing phone pics I accepted its shortcomings and worked around them. It's hands down the best phone I've ever owned by a large margin. My LG 2 isn't even close despite a much better screen, better specs etc.
I personally think a phone should only be hurt score-wise in a review by poor performance or design. I hate amoled screens but understand some love them. Its only a con to me or those that are like minded that the 1020 suffers from the use of one.
I don't even think a lack of external storage should be a con unless every single phone you review is judged by the same standard. It's not even annoying now to me that I have to connect to my computer once a month to off load my pics. How silly to not buy the best camera in a phone for that reason. Just stupid.
I think it depends how you want to use your phone. When I was looking for an upgrade for my iphone, I wanted a bigger screen - I was thinking 5.5" max. The size of the 1520 was off-putting but after considering how I wanted to use it - how I am using it - to watch videos, play games, music and view photos in at least high definition, the 6" screen became the obvious choice. If you want a phone to simply make calls and sms, 4.3" is right for you. If you want a phone that not only has a brilliant display but also the insides to make it an amazing experience, the bigger the better.
Plus, windows phone is better with more tiles on your screen.
My friend had a 1520 I like big screens. awesome for watching movies games etc. But I can't afford it in India. I hope 1325 comes :)
I was also worried about usability of 1520 before I bought it, but now I am loving it and cannot see myself moving back to a smaller device
If VZW offered it, I would get one. Probably wouldn't need a tablet.
Posted via Windows Phone Central App
Surely it's... The main problem is 930 Should have released along with this one. Now this one is too big and when 930 arrives it will be too old in the market for flagship. In mean time we are waiting...waiting and waiting........
+1520
I consider it a CON when it is used as a phone to make calls - I get stares and some LOLs. The thing is huge up to my face!
Other than that, I think it is all PRO. The size is fantastic.
It has almost completely replaced my tablet. If I had the Comixology app on my 1520, I'd be all set.
wp8.2 should add 2 app split screen on the huge screen !!!
I luv my 1520
For me what is "con" is releasing a Galaxy-Note-like without stylus !
I love my 1520 red. I wondered if it would be too big also. I was at Disney for a week and took my phone everywhere. Taking pictures. In and out of my pants pocket getting on rides. I had no problem what so ever with the size of the phone getting in the way. Never slowed me down. The phone took awesome pictures by the way. My girlfriend picks on me about my phone being a laptop but when she plays games on her Samsung gal4 she's always complaining that she can't see it. Like clad of clans.
Have had my 1520 for 3 months now and will never ever go to anything smaller. I'm 6-2 with fairly big hands and it is perfect size for me. Perfect size for working with spreadsheets which I do a lot of.
That it doesn't come in blue, now that is a con.
I love the 6" screen. I never hold it up to my head and talk on the phone. I decided that 90% of the time the device I have on me is my phone for internet and apps, so I wanted the largest screen possible.
Well, I own a Lumia 1520, and its my daily driver. Yes, in a way, I call it a con, in a way, but not entirely. The first reason I bought it its because of it size, I love big phones ( because of my chubby fingers but I digress). And it is not its size that I call it a con, its the "display size". It is the same as my Lumia 920. I thought I could get bigger reading space when I type, but no, the keyboard takes half of the screen, just as the Lumia 920. I felt cheated. It doesn't mean I hate the Lumia 1520. I love it, it has a gorgeous screen.
I made the leap from an iPhone to a 1520 two months ago. Yes, it's big and it took a bit of getting used too, but I absolutely love this phone. The specs are great and the screen is beautiful. It's not for everyone, that's for sure. What's funny is I have busted no less than five people peeking over my shoulder checking out my phone. One gentleman went as far as to ask me about it, which I was happy to show off my 1520. To each their own. What is important is that Nokia/Microsoft keeps cranking out quality devices and hopefully people will realize how bitchin Windows phones really are.
The phone's size is not a con. The con is lack of a smaller version of that phone (let's say a next gen 925)
I have two 1520's. Yeah, like that model that much. As everyone for the most part has pointed out, we are using the wrong terminology. So, why continue with this line of q and a?
The phone can be used one handed, depending on what you are doing, and where you place the tile. It is extraordinarily thin. This takes away much of the realization of size while using it. That is, until you set the phone near another, then you may be taken aback. Usually, most people are interested and WP8.1 has done wonders regarding the keyboard size and app appearance. With Windows Phone 8.0, everything is just expanded, to a ridiculous point, to fill the screen.
The main points of appreciation for me is: media consumption. It is worth noting that the technical abilities of the phone has been like a gift that keeps on giving via updates. The upcoming cyan update only emphasizes this. Regarding the screen:
I had sent my phone back for white spots. The refurbished screens had been redone. The rubber seal is different and the screen creates less anomalies when pressed a bit harder than one normally would. I am hoping this long standing manufacturing issue may be resolved. I had really wanted Sony's Xperia Z Ultra, but AT&T does not carry it. M Moreover, I have grown weary of babysitting memory for android on my tablet. Also, I have had Windows phones since 7.0.
The size has allowed me to not use my tablet at all. Now, if only cyan will push the OTG drivers for mouse/keyboard/controller which was been mentioned as part of the update then fallen by the wayside.
It is good to have a 6" phone as an option s looking as you have the main stream 5" phone available. But Nokia did it the other way around. Still do not have Lumia 930 here in Asia.
I find the question "con verses a personal preference" a useless distinction. If one thinks a six inch display is too large for one's needs, it's a con. For me it is in fact a con.
Given I do think that the maket tendency is towards phones of approximately five inch displays I suggest that phones larger and smaller than that can be thought of niche phones and their associated display sizes can easily be viewed as cons for the majority of the market.
Remember that the 1520 is a Phablet. Would you consider a 4.7 or a 4.5 screen a phablet? I have a average hand. At first it was too big for my hands, but you'll get used to it. Everytime I grab my 920 it feels smaller now. So no. It's not a CON for me.
Is it fair to say that the Iphone copying by Nokia is an..........iCon? *snigger*
I'm joking of course before I get crucified and spat on, I'm Nokia through and through
It's great for me - I am a big guy, so I have no problem pocketing it. ALSO, the phone is THIN. The 930 seems chunky by comparison.... I completely understand that the 1520 is too big for most folks - although the huge numbers of Galaxy and Note phones I see in the wild actually says otherwise....
It really depends
I moved from Focus 4" to 1020 4.5". I was worried about the phone be a little too large (pocket-wise), but now I absolutely love the large viewing area.
I won't hesitate to move to a 5" for my next phone.
That been said, after playing with 1520, I wouldn't consider it. But I have seen people on the train enjoy it.
It is a personal preference, we purchased the 1520 for my wife (her first WP) it was to big for her. Now I have it, only complaint is it not always comfortable in my pants pocket and it is funny when talking into it.
I love my 1320 its really a great size the 6" screen is prefect for me now when using a friends iphone they feel tiny and makes me think its a toy but to call its size a con is unfair not everyone wants to drive a big V8 but you would never says the engine is a con
No not a con.. Their are many different phones under the Nokia/Microsoft umbrella. Pick one that suits your lifestyle!
I have to say this now after getting one, but yes.
The size is a con. I had a Lumia 820 before, now the 1520. Because of its size, it doesn't feel anywhere near as solid. Combine that with the fact that I have one with a flimsy power button honestly makes it feel a little cheap. The camera bulge causes a visible and very obvious distortion in the screen when you put pressure on it (simply laying it down will cause the distortion) and that could be doing damage to the LCD panel that will only show up in the long-run.
It's a great phone, but sadly, this is the first smartphone I've ever had where I worry about its longevity. I wish I'd gotten a 1020 instead. Fortunately I got it on AT&T Next, so if it's acting batty in 10 months, I can ditch it for something else.
Yup I Wanted a nice upgrade from my 920 but the latest at&t wp8 is too big. Its a shame the 930/icon isn't on at&t. That would of been perfect....
I don't think so. I am using it for few months now and the size is absolutely perfect. It looks weird for a while to use but when used to it, there's no issues at all.
The only con of the 1520 is that I can't find a new Red RM-938 in stock. The size is perfect. I would use a BlueAnt Q3 anyway. I love the screen size while viewing docs, web, etc. on the go without requiring a tab. It will be a companion to my upcoming SP3 though.
We have phones, phablets and tablets.... Yes its to big for a phone....but its the right size for a phablet.
For me it is.
I love large displays!
Cons are subjective. From a techs perspective the cons should be functionality omitted by the hardware manufacturers by comparison to other devices produced by that manufacturing company or its competitors in the same class.
No it's not a con it is a feature targeting a certain niche like a 41 MP hump on the back of your phone
I will never go back to a smaller screen than my 1520.
What an odd discussion. Almost everything is a compromise, and what's a "pro" and "con" is entirely subjective. For me, it's a con. I wear relatively tight-fitting clothing and don't want to walk around with a 6 inch phone in my pocket. If I was a woman with a purse, I might feel very differently.
So yeah, it's fair to say it's a "con," if that's how you feel.
I have large hands and find the 1520 to be the best size to hold and ise with one hand. When I had my 925 it was difficult to use one handed, so I would say it is great for me.
Nope, if you dont like the screen size then get a 930/Icon
Too big. :) definitely a con. So instead, I say: I-con! Hehe, get it? ;)
When I got my Xperia (4.5"), I thought it massive, moving from a feature phone. I'm considering the 1520 and the size is a issue but I'll probably get used to it very quickly.
Agreed. Especially when you consider price. The iPhone hasn't changed much since it launched 7 years ago and despite having a 4" screen starts at £500
It is a con if having a large screen on a phone is a con for you. That is what boils down to. If you're asking another question, say "I need a phone with 1080p, 20MP, with microSD, and it must be WP8 and Nokia and on AT&T" but don't want a screen larger than 5", then it is a con because other criteria being met notwithstanding, the hold back is that it is larger than 5". Such an odd question. Is the size of a hummer a con? I don't know. How much money do you have for gas, do you live where lanes are super tiny, what about parking and weight, etc?? LOL
I am using Lumia 1520 for et least 2 weeks now and the other phones seems very small to me. Lumia 1520 it's not a big phone to me it is standard size for me any more cause if you use this massive phone for 2 day you started to think the others are very small.
I say it's a con. Not only is it ridiculous looking, but Nokia's thing for huge bezels makes it even bigger.
As I am a very tall guy(6'5") and a heavy phone user for work(and some playing), I bought the 1520 when it came out. I thought it might be too big but after a couple of weeks I got my old 920 out to sell on ebay and boy did it feel small. Also, the performance, battery life, and the camera is far superior over my old 920.
I think it is a preference thing. One thing nice about windows phones is you have a choice of size, features, colors, and price. Not like the cryphones.
I think it could be considered a con within the context of "there isn't a five inch version with SD and Snapdragon 800 and glance screen and 20MP"... If the 930 had those features then it would never be an issue. It's a problem when they make a phone so close to perfect but it may be too big for portions with smaller hands and pockets... Although I have one and think it's perfect.
It's a pro not con :)
+1520
This phone is the best. Wish all the apps are optimized for 6' inches. Even wpcentral app doesn't have full screen option. I hope there is an update soon.
I've got one and its fine. I do get the looks but the ladies luuuuuurve the yellow :-)
I recently purchased a 1520, and although I love my old Lumia 900 and 920, I don't think I could go back to that size. For me this is the perfect size phone. It's not a con; that would be like saying a full size pickup should be penalized for its size. It could be a con for an individual who doesn't like big phones, but in general It's just a preference.
I don't know...give me one and I'll try it out and get back to you on whether or not its to big. But I'm guessing no.
It's a feature. And if you are in the market for a large screen that is a pro. If you like small phones and you are given a 1520 and you don't like how big it is. Its a con to your unique situation. Normally you would have the choice to get what you want and the screen size is not a feature you are just stuck with.
I like my 1520
For me its perfect. Got myself the 920 a 15 months ago, thought it was huge, then after 2-3 months it felt small. After a year with the 920 I ordered the 1520 due to its screen size. Felt HUGE for about 30 minutes then it started to really fit me. It was either getting a 5"-5.3" phone AND an android tablet or the 1520, and I chose the 1520. I want everything in one device. Period.
The icon would be a good choice for me but for personal reasons I will never have a Verizon phone.
I'd prefer a smaller phone but I think the 1520 is definitely nice, just not for me.
Does it make sense to regularly make an article out of a forum topic only to spawn another thread of comments covering the same topic?
Hey...I love the 1520. Everyone has their own preference. If the shoe doesn't fit you, of course your not going to wear it.
Different strokes for different folks. For me the 520 is far too small while the 1520 is almost the ideal size. For my wife the 1520 is gargantuan while the 520 is just about perfect. It all depends on how you stow it, and what you use it for.
Now with that said, a large bezel is certainly a negative. For example, the Lumia 920 has a 4.5" screen while the Lumia 930 has a 5" screen and is only marginally larger. Just 2 years ago a 5" device would be considered a phablet, but today nobody in their right mind would consider the 930 a phablet because it is almost the same size as mainstream phones of the last generation. They are running out of bezel space to cut down on to continue such a trend, but we could probably see mainstream 5.5" phones with no bezel in another few years that will be no larger than the good 'ol 4.5" lumia 920.
Similarly, I think that the 1520 is pretty good by today's standards, and it is no larger than the 5-5.5" tablets from a few years previous; But if a lumia 1530 is released a year from now and has the same ratio of screen to bezel then I would count that as a negative. Either the screen continues to get bigger as the bezel shrinks to maintain the same overall phone size, or else the screen stays the same size and the overall phone shrinks. It is the progress that ultimately makes it a plus or minus, not the overall screen size itself.
I don't consider it a con, but I wouldn't buy it because to me six inches is too large. I think five too five and a half inches is ideal. I'm a Lumia 920 user with large hands fyi.
Its a matter of a personal preference & taste ... Some people like big phones, some don't.
Personally though, I don't like big phones ... They are too big for a phone, too small for a tablet ... Its a comprise.
And for all the extra size, they don't offer anything other than screen real-estate.
I tried the Note II when it came out & decided to stick with my Atrix. I couldn't use it comfortably with one hand. Also played with an Xperia Z Ultra ... Thank you, but no thank you.
I love my 1520. My biggest worry is whether Nokia/Microsoft will be bringing out another phablet in 18 months time (when I'm due a phone upgrade)
Love the phone personally but there are people who don't like to carry big screens.. Microsoft needs to think about them too
I don't think its a con as much as a trade off
I have the 1520. Yes it's big but so are the Samsung galaxy note and mega. It took a while to get use to the size but the features are a no brainer. I'm hooked on this phone and the screen size is now a must have for me.
It is neither a pro nor con. Too subjective.
I will just say something, I got laid many times thanx to my galaxy note 2. I'm eager to get the l1520.
Main reason I wanted it. Absolutely love my 1520!
Judging by phone review sites, its too large if its a WP but its the perfect size for those that need a larger phone if its an Android phone.
Nope, I have right now one ativ S and one 625. In the past I had an S4 (before I took the jump to WP). I feel this screen size to be small, my next phone, I'm just waiting for a flagship release from Microsoft, will be an 6'' screen. I work on the telecommunications area and I used the 1320, so, no, 6'' is not too big.
Its a pro that the reason why i bought it and i love it, if you dont want a big phone/screen, go for the icon or whatever else !!!
Yes, I have one and work in wireless retailso I get to heart what customers day about the phone. It definitely is a con. I switched to a Note 3 for the week and it doesn't feel too small. 6" is definitely too big.
Posted via Windows Phone Central App
Slow news day?
Is is just me, or is the article title a little "clickbaity"?
It is a con to me, simple.
If I was a businessman doing a lot of work with MS Office, emails and charts "on the go" driving my Mercedes I most definitely would not mind the size of 1520. But for my taste its size IS a con I like carrying everything in my jeans pockets.
Is there any WP under 4 inch with 1 GB Memory? Nope!
Not for me, in fact I'm waiting for its succesor. I like to carry one thing instead of two. What is a con is its weight, too much...should be around same weight than note 3. Hope new one wont have that
It depends on the marketing. If it is marketed as a device for those who want something else than the flagship Lumia, it is not a con.
If it is marketed as the flagship with no other high end Lumias, the size should definitely be considered as a con.
You guys talk about diversity, but there really isn't any when it comes to the lumia line. We can thank carrier exclusives for that.
ATT doesn't have the icon (which i consider to be the pefect size) and verizon doesn't have the 1020 or the 1520.
It's very simple, if nokia and microsoft want my money on another phone.
5-5.5 1080 (at least) screen (with glance intact)
Built in wireless charging
I'll assume whatever comes next has a great camera, don't think their dumb enough to come up short on that end.
So, my answer is yes i think the 1520 size is a con, one i could probably get over if the phone had wireless charging. And no i don't think i should have to mod the phone or pay $200 more than it's value to get a foreign version.
Why not sell unlocked with the features we want at the MS store?
The 1020 Susie is supposed to be the McLaren and it will be on tmi att and vzn
Who cares? Give me McLaren!!!!!!!!!
No, Personal preference.
I have the 1320, absolutely perfect for kindle, pocketmags, watching tv (especially the world cup) web viewing, videos, pictures, hardly ever zoom in on items and you can get more tiles on start screen, wouldn't be looking to drop a size now....6" with everything on please.....
Yes, it can be seen as a con. That was the best WP you could buy at the time, but I didn't want it due to the size.I waited for the 930 announcement, but then was disappointed it wasn't coming to AT&T (let alone the US). I ended up with a 925 due to the price and size.
Size ain't everything But seriously?? Why have such pointless discussion?? We are all different we all like different styles of handset,different sizes some small some large. What's the big deal?? If you don't like the large size then you don't buy it,simples. It's like when someone asks what colour is best. Well,colour is personal preference why ask?? Silly discussion.
Bottomline if you have tiny little girlie hands then the 1520 just isn't for you.
Not a con but they should have released the 1520 design in both 6" and 5" screens at the same time. The Icon/930 design is too thick, square edges, and bulky.
What is a con is removing Qi wireless charging and only offering a 16GB model at launch. Hear that AT&T???
Luckily we only got the 32GB here in Sweden :P But seriously, never ever in your life move here xD we're slow when it comes to Nokia. Took 1020 almost a year before it was available here compared to US. And 920 got available 15 months ago. 1520 3 months ago xD
I knew what I was buying when I bought the 1520. But for me at least, the drawbacks are the dialer which can't be done with one hand, and of course one handed typing. Even with Word Flow, I struggle. This is not a con of the phone, I'm just unable to do a few things. Apart from that, this thing is a beast.
Not at all a con... Only a matter of personal preference. When I saw it for the first time at the store I thought "danm this thing is huge! Who would use that???" Then the more I looked at it, played around with it, the more I got used to it... Now my 925 looks like it was made for my little sister's barbie doll! Ridiculously small!!!
I want it mostly for its size
I've yet to try one, but I wouldn't mind having one
Very fair. I want the 930 size on AT&T
I will say size is not a con , it will be con for people using it who cannt use it due to its size on day to day basis. Would have preferred to have icon all the features as 1520 ,may be next phone will
I don't know if I can go back to anything smaller than 6". So I'm not sure how it could be a con if I prefer it.
I have the 1520. It is not a con. I have a Bluetooth earpiece for texting, and phone calls. I pull out the phone when I want the screen. After one week it doesn't seem large anymore as you are used to it. It's the best phone ever, and certainly is only for people who want the value of real estate. Best phone I ever had.
I tried l1320 but If I hold phone so I can reach top of the screen, I can't reach back button which is unacceptable for me. I like to use phone with one hand. I saw l1520 has narrower placement of buttons, so maybe it will be better.
I love my 1520. I grabbed it on a special preorder from AT&T for $150 and had it in my hand a week before it hit the stores. It is simply the best phone I have ever owned. I will never go back to a regular sized phone again.
I actually don't consider it a con in case of the Lumia 1520, nor in any other Phablet out there really. It all comes down to features and specifications that the device offers mainly, and then to a matter of personal preference.
For me, I pretty much decided on the Lumia 1520 as my next device after the Lumia 920 because of the higher resolution and more powerful camera along with SD card support and 2 GB RAM. I could have just as easily gone for the Lumia 1020 with its superior camera and similar specs as the 1520, albeit the smaller resolution, and it would have cost me Rs. 10,000 (approx $100) less to have done so. But for me, the size of the 1520 though a bit large at first, is just perfect at being the right amount of large. I love the display and the screen size (despite some trouble with one-handed use - yippee for voice commands though!)
In short, size does matter but to some extent. I probably would never go for a smaller screen size on a phone in the future as I love the extra real estate (resolution is extremely important - it wouldn't serve much purpose had the Lumia 1520 had the same resolution as, say, the Lumia 920 device). But that's just my preference... From what I've seen, I put performance and specifications high on my list... if the device offers a better set of features and overall experience, no matter what the screen size, I get used to it.
I've used devices such as the iPhone (first gen), Xperia X1, HTC Mozart, HTC One, BlackBerry Bold Touch, Samsung Galaxy S3, iPhone 5, BlackBerry Z10 Lumia 920 and more... And each time, screen size has played close to none, if any at all, significance in my decision.
Though I have to admit, considering how much I'm enjoying the Lumia 1520... I might change my opinion soon! ;)
I love my Lumia 1520, the size does get some getting used to but I'd struggle to go back to any 4.5 inch 920 now. It's all about personal choice at the end of the day.
It's not the size that matters but how you use it. I worry about the corners of the screen cracking while in my pocket. Anyone had issues with this. My 920 has cracks across both lower corners.
By lumia 920 screen broke when it slipped from my hand and fell on rock. Since it has insurance, at&t replaced my phone with 1520. Initially i thought it is to big for my tast. After using it for a week, I started loving it. 1080p screen on 6 inch phone is really gorgeous and sound from sperker is rocking. Once I get used to it, I never wanted to go back to smaller 5 inch phone :p
I really would love to have the 1520. I love WP, but something I'll have to get used to is the size of the new phones. I really like the size of my 620 (and I know most people prefer bigger phones). Plus, as a girl, even the 620 doesn't fit in all my pockets. All I know is that the 1520 is amazing and when gets the time to change my phone, I'll stick to WP!
I personally think they should left this out of their review system. I know it's part of the user experience but user experience differ on their base usage size. As a phablet I believe it should be graded as a phablet itself. Then if all phones were graded on their specific sizes then shouldn't the Note 3 also? But I don't see that.
If the Lumia 1520 were entitled as a device that is 'too big' for a 'phablet' then I considered that valid.
Now now if they really felt the phone needs some sizing remarks then they should include it in their intro and justify their reason.
Just simply don't downgrade the phone any further because of it's valid size.
I'm in the market for a new phone, 1520 has everything I want but am concerned about size and curious about the next wave of Microsoft devices so don't really want to buy old tech
Size doesn't matter. :P
The phone side is a pro! I love it. I can't go back to smaller phones
Only con is its the only high end WP on att ......does not give much choices
It's a pro! If you want a device with the same specs, but a smaller screen, get the Lumia Icon or Lumia 930. It's unique for its design and screen. I really want one, but I haven't even spent one year with my Lumia 920. It's definatly not a con.
When I first read about it I thought it would be way to big. When I saw in the store thought it was not too bad and bought it cause I liked the specs though I wondered what people would think. After 6 months I cannot imagine going back to any 4.x screen. I have big hands and any 4.x are just too small now. That includes my beloved 920.
No Lumia between 1320 (20000INR) to 1520 (45000+ INR) that support sd card is a big con. But the size 6", as I have a big hand is pro for me.. Using 1320 easily... Cannot afford 1520.
It's a characteristic personal opinion for people who don't like the big screen. It's not a "con" and it will never be a "con".
Sounds to me that some folks have large screen envy.....
What I don't understand is why Microsoft hasn't added voice to text on it's keyboard on 8.1. This one feature would stop all this silly screen envying and allow those small handed people the opportunity to use the best overall Windows phone on the market.
You can never please the self conscious people on how a large phone will look as they use it....these folks have to freeze their butts off in the winter months because of having to make a fashion statement as well. That plus the fact that it is difficult to text on unnoticed when they shouldn't be texting......
I suppose a few might have a issue with buying a quality Bluetooth headset too..but without the ability to utilize it with voice to text and have it implemented correctly into the keyboard..that is more logical to complain about than that of just if the size of this device......or debate that the size is a con.
The phone is great btw and it's keyboard is cobbled because of the lack of voice to text..as of now..where as the Androids with larger screens have had this on them for some time now..
Yeah, voice to text would've been perfect for the 1520 and similar sized phones. Bad thing is thou, not even the Android ones I've tried have support for my language. There's no damn new smartphone with either voice to text or text to speech support in Swedish. My old Symbian Nokia did however have Swedish text to speech :s
Love the screen size. Great for old eyes. So for me it is a pro.
Had the 800, 820, 920 and finally 1520. The 1520 is BY FAR the bestest phone. All the others are tiny pieces of garbage.
At long last I can watch films, read the news and type emails properly. LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT. Lumia 8.1 ROCKS.
Just another device to keep the masses happy, some prefer large devices some prefer smaller devices. It is up to user to decide based on their needs once again.
I'm not really a fan of phones with screens over 5" but people should just be happy they can get a windows phone with all the big specs and features INCLUDING SD expandable memory.If I was going to upgrade my Lumia 820 I would upgrade to this phone for sure.
Of course it is in the same way a big SUV or truck is that only gets 10 miles to the gallon. It's big and nice but not everyone wants to deal with the size. So it's not really a con for the sake of being a con. It's a con depending on what the individual is looking for.
Got the 1520 recently and its not bulky at all, quite slim as a matter of fact. Loving the screen size and and all the other features that come with it. Upgraded from a 920 and im feeling glad i did so.
If you buy shoes that are too big for your feet, that makes you a moron
Since you cannot increase tile density above that which you can achieve on a 520 with WP8.1, yes it is a con.
I got one from Microsoft store for free. Nothing to complain though. Though I was wanting a 1020 successor, and still in love with my 920, I really enjoy using the 1520, brilliant display (I prefer IPS) with powerful guts. A bright yellow 1520 always draws others attention, I agree its not a "everyone" phone due to its size, but its a great device in every perspectives. One major con is, why AT&T took out the Qi wireless charging? I've invested two charging plates, and a JBL speaker already, now my 920 lies on top of the speaker every day...
It isn't a con... Even on smaller phones, most of the time it's better to use the phone two-handed... Typing is faster, less chances of dropping it, better theft protection... For the issue with pockets, that's easy... Wear proper pants and not those skinny jeans and it'll fit...
Darn, i dropped it and costed me $200 to fix it...
+521!
Well comparing it with 930/Icon,
1- Glance vs No glance
2- MICRO SD vs No MICRO SD
3- Flashy Whole body colors vs only back plate color.
4- AND THE MOST IMPORTANT THING......
3400 MAH VS 2420 MAH.
Also once you get used to it, there's no turning back.
Personally I believe the 6 inch is best in almost everything e.g play asphalt 8 and then see the difference...!
Agree, I love the battery and the overall performance, comparing to 920. Same Royal Revolt 2 just a bit laggy on 920...no turning back, but I want Qi implemented, fxck you AT&T
If i could, i would get my self a 1520 over my 1020 without hesitations. Now I have not the money so maybe later. I let that speak for it self, the screen size is a preference and not a con.
I consider it a con, but others may not. Some people may consider the size of a 4" to 5" phone a con.
It's a preference and we're lucky to have the choice.
The only reason it's been cast by since as a "Con" is that other than its camera it has the top set of specs for Win Phone for far too long.
If an ~5" successor to the Lumia 1020 with up to date chassis specs were sitting beside it I think people would be happy both existed, regardless of their personal preference.
As soon as I have the cash (or one that's got a large screen) I am getting this as I really appreciate a large screen.
Yes and no.
I have the 1520 and I have ZERO/NO/NADA regrets. This phone is not as bulky as one might think. And the added real estate on the screen is AWESOME ! I upgraded from a 920 and I have not looked back one bit. So I can agree screen size should not be a con.
Sigh, I wish I could get one also.
Definetly! It's much bigger than other phones with the same screen size!
I don't know about you guys, but I am waiting for the like of Lumia 930 with expandable storage and replacable battery. Maybe 90% of people have the very same wish. I know, I know the common explanation -- according to the manufacturers, with all the cloud options, nobody really needs expandable storage and replacable battery, but can't you just make everybody's dream come true and see what happens? Wolud you please listen Nokia and Microsoft?
I'd go with calling it personal preference, after all people buy 7-8 inch tablets and it's not impractical to want to consolidate your devices. I wouldn't get a 1520 simply because I have tiny hands. Even my 920 has me reaching sometimes but I love it nonetheless. The 1520 is gorgeous, just not for everyone.
I don't know how you can call it a Con when there's multiple Lumia devices and form factors to choose from. Having 1 device/form factor for your whole Cell Phone offering (iPhone) is a Con, IMO.
If Nokia only came out with 1 phone a year, and this time it happened to be 6", I'd call that a Con.
I call it a CONversation piece. I get the "WHAT is that?" response a couple times a week I'd say. I then get to show off Windows 8.1 to the unknowing. I do my best at trying to grow the brand.
Pages