Nintendo's controversial "summon and fight" anti-Palworld patent could get smacked down, in a shock move, by the head of the U.S. Patent Office

Nintendo’s arsenal against Palworld is in serious trouble. In a move almost unheard of, the head of the U.S. Patent Office has personally stepped in to review one of Nintendo’s most controversial patents, the one that claims ownership of a basic game mechanic "summoning a helper and letting it fight in one of two modes."

In our previous article on Nintendo's U.S. efforts to collect anti-Palworld patents, patent 12403397 garnered quite the outcry from the gaming community as it targeted such a generic gaming mechanic used in hundreds of other games.

It looks like the outrage actually worked. Latest findings from Gamesfray show that the head of the U.S. Patent Office has stepped in to review whether this should have been granted in the first place.

Why are the U.S. Patent Office reviewing the patent?

Yesterday, USPTO Director John A. Squires ordered a "reexamination" of Nintendo’s U.S. Patent No. 12,403,397. So the patent office is taking another look at whether this patent should exist at all. Why?

Because two older patents, one from Konami (2002) and one from Nintendo itself (2019) already describe the same idea. Both show a player being able to fight in manual mode or automatic mode, which was the key feature Nintendo claimed was unique.

This is huge. The last time a USPTO Director did this was more than a decade ago. Normally, these reviews only happen when a company files a challenge. Here, the Director has acted on his own. Likely because of the backlash over this patent from gaming media and potential damage the reputation of the U.S. Patent system.

After all, the mechanic is in so many other games, it baffled many of us that those who put the patent through didn't spot this.

What happens next?

Nintendo has two months to respond to the reexamination order, and even Director ordered reexaminations can be upheld. However, it's highly likely the patent will be revoked based on its similarity to other existing patents.

Given that this comes just days after the Japan Patent Office rejected a "monster capture" patent claim from Nintendo because it wasn't original enough, it's not looking good. Two of the world's biggest patent offices are now questioning Nintendo's strategy.

Nintendo claims these patents are to protect innovation, but it does look from the outside that it's an attempt to monopolize basic game rules in their ongoing battle against Palworld.

For now, the clock is ticking on Nintendo to respond, but the fact the USPTO Director himself has stepped in shows just how controversial this "summon and fight" patent is.

FAQ

Follow Windows Central on Google News to keep our latest news, insights, and features at the top of your feeds!