For a few months now, rumors have been building that Microsoft could start to use AMD chips in some of its newer Surface devices. These follow reports that we may also see a Snapdragon-powered Surface PC as well. The claims make sense as Microsoft likely wants to spread some of the Surface-love around to its major chip partners instead of exclusively using Intel.
The funny thing is while AMD is experiencing a deserved resurgence on desktop and gaming PCs, I'm not quite sure why this would be important for laptops. AMD's mobile presence is only simmering, but not on fire.
Surface Laptop 3 15-inch with AMD: the rumors
The current rumors reported at WinFuture.de come from various sources, including Twitter user @TUM_APISAK and editor of WinFuture Roland Quandt, who tweeted about a "a pretty official-looking price/spec list (cut-out) for what seems to be the new Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15-inch model based on AMD Ryzen."
The rumors are unverified at this point and should be taken as such.
If true, however, the purported processors used would be Ryzen 5 3550U and Ryzen 7 3750U. More interestingly, models will reportedly come with 8GB, 12GB, or 16GB of RAM with those Ryzen CPUs scaling with four-core, six-core, and even eight-core variants matching those RAM configurations. The weird part is there is technically no eight-core mobile Ryzen CPU yet.
These models will reportedly let Microsoft scale pricing for the 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 from $1,000 up to $2,400 giving plenty of leeway for consumers.
All these reports are plausible, but even the 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 currently is uncorroborated.
So why AMD, anyway?
The thing I am trying to wrap my head around is what does AMD get us in a laptop in 2019 over Intel. That sounds like a loaded and maybe even trolling question, but it's not.
When I speak with PC manufacturers I almost always ask about AMD – specifically why are their mobile chips not being used. Many of the top manufacturers tell me the first-gen Ryzens were just not that good, but these latest ones show more promise. Performance in some cases outperforms a similar Intel configuration, but battery life suffers too with on average about a one-hour loss in longevity.
There is a cost savings to consider, albeit modest. I'm told AMD mobile chips cost around $50 cheaper than Intel. For big companies placing an order for 1,000 business laptops, that $50 represents a significant saving. That difference can then be used elsewhere or used to sink back into those laptops (e.g. more RAM).
For consumers, though, I'm not quite sure that $50 adds up to that much, especially when premium Surface products are on the table.
Moreover, I don't understand why an AMD mobile experience is necessarily better than Intel – but I'm willing to be convinced. It will be exciting – if these rumors are true – to see what AMD gets us over an Intel/NVIDIA-based system and why Microsoft went that route.
AMD and competition are a good thing
Putting aside my skepticism, one thing we all can agree on is processor competition is excellent for the industry and consumers. Intel has been riding the Ultrabook category – which it started – for a long time. Qualcomm's entrance and now AMD's seem to be again lighting a fire under Intel, which is why its 10th Gen series looks so compelling. New Wi-Fi 6, native Thunderbolt 3, Bluetooth 5, and optional LTE bring a serious feature package that companies like Lenovo, Dell, and HP find hard to resist.
Perhaps what is more intriguing is AMD and Microsoft already have a long history. Specifically, the silicon in the Xbox One, One S, One X, and next-gen Scarlett series are all custom AMD solutions. That raises the prospect that a 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 could have some "special sauce" for its processor and (presumably) Vega GPU.
Finally, it's worth pointing out just how fun all of this is these days. In a world where major tech announcements are leaked days, weeks, and months in advance, it's refreshing to have so much mystery around Microsoft's October 2 event.
But back to AMD, why do you think it would be a good thing to have their chips in a Surface device? What makes them so much better than Intel? Let me know.
Get the Windows Central Newsletter
All the latest news, reviews, and guides for Windows and Xbox diehards.
Daniel Rubino is the Editor-in-chief of Windows Central, head reviewer, podcast co-host, and analyst. He has been covering Microsoft since 2007 when this site was called WMExperts (and later Windows Phone Central). His interests include Windows, laptops, next-gen computing, and for some reason, watches. Before all this tech stuff, he worked on a Ph.D. in linguistics, watched people sleep (for medical purposes!), and ran the projectors at movie theaters because it was fun.