4 years ago, Microsoft thought dual-screen devices were the future

Surface Neo in laptop mode
(Image credit: Future)

On October 2, 2019, Microsoft held what was arguably the best Surface event it's ever put on. It was supposed to be a pinnacle moment for Windows and Surface, with the company willingly pulled back the curtain on products and plans that weren’t yet ready. It was at this event that Microsoft unveiled what it thought was the future of the PC space; dual-screen devices and Windows 10X.

The event started like any other, with a straight to the point unveiling of a new Surface Laptop and Surface Pro. Same design, new specs. Overall good products. Then things went up a notch with the unveiling of the Surface Pro X, which was Microsoft’s first Windows 10 on ARM and an interesting look at where the Surface Pro line was going with regard to design.

But it was the Surface Neo and Surface Duo unveiling that took the world by storm. After then EVP Panos Panay wrapped up his Surface Pro X talk, he paused and said this:

“Now I want to do something we’ve not done before. I want to take a few minutes with you, to talk a little bit about the future of our products.” With hindsight, perhaps Panay wasn’t so sure about talking about the future after all. “I have been debating how to do this, this is not my thing. How do we show you our products before they’re finished? … I was backstage with Satya and I told him I’m more nervous than normal.”

He then went on to state that the product he was about to talk about would be coming next year and compared it to what Surface Pro did for Windows 8 in 2012. “Today we want to introduce you to a new product that I believe is the next category.” Panay claims this device is built to be smaller, personal, yet fully productive.

We then get an incredibly polished look at the Surface Neo, and it looked fantastic. A dual-screen PC running a new version of Windows that’s faster, modern, lightweight, and more secure than any version of Windows before it. It’s unlike any other PC we’ve ever seen, and it’s coming next holiday. I was ecstatic.

There were a few curious statements made during the Surface Neo’s unveiling, including the fact that dual-screens makes you more productive. Panay claimed that Microsoft had “measured brains” to come to this conclusion. While many assumed Microsoft had opted for dual-screen because foldable screens weren’t ready yet, Panay’s talk implies dual-screen was chosen because it’s better for productivity.

After the Surface Neo was unveiled to the world, Panay ended his talk with a “thank you.” But as he began to walk off stage, he paused, turned around, and proclaimed “we’re not done.”

What?

As a member of that audience, I can’t tell you how intense the next few moments were. Nobody knew what was about to be unveiled. We had known for some time that Microsoft was working on a dual-screen phone, but rumors from about a year beforehand proclaimed the project was dead. Turns out, it wasn’t dead, it just switched operating systems… and that’s when Microsoft unveiled the Surface Duo.

I think, based on my tweets from this moment, you can tell I was excited. In fact, I think everyone was excited. It was a bold idea; Microsoft hardware design paired with Google’s Android software. It’s a Microsoft phone without an app gap… ideally, this should be the success story Microsoft has been waiting for, right?

This moment was probably the pinnacle of excitement for me in my career covering technology. I was all-in on Microsoft’s vision for the future of Surface and Windows. I was ready to be that guy with a dual-screen PC in my bag and dual-screen phone in my pocket. Roll on Holiday 2020.

Vaporware and failure

(Image credit: Future)

Things didn’t exactly go to plan, unfortunately. We all know it now, but the Surface Neo was a pipe dream; A product that Microsoft wasn’t actually able to build. The hardware was beautiful, but plagued with bad silicon that caused the device to overheat. It was also launching with an operating system that wasn’t ready, and needed at least another couple of years in the oven.

So in May 2020, just seven months after Surface Neo was unveiled to the world, Microsoft announced that the device was postponed and Windows 10X would be delayed. Curiously, Surface Duo was not delayed, and launched ahead of schedule on September 10, 2020.

Surface Duo was our first look at Microsoft’s vision for a productive smartphone. A dual-screen device running Android. On paper, why would this fail? As long as Microsoft nails the software experience, this device should be a hit? Well, unfortunately, Microsoft didn’t nail the software experience, not even close.

The Surface Duo famously launched with what might be the buggiest launch day software ever seen on an Android phone. The device barely worked as intended. I was a day one buyer, and I can admit that the software was rough. Many people returned theirs due to the software alone. Then there was the fact that Surface Duo was missing key smartphone features, like NFC for wireless payments, wireless charging, and a good camera.

(Image credit: Future)

These issues were addressed with Surface Duo 2, but the market had already made up its mind about a Microsoft-made dual-screen phone by then. Many reviewers panned the Surface Duo 2 for not being a true foldable, and this caused Microsoft to push on the brakes. I loved my Surface Duo 2, but the market seemingly didn’t want to pay such high prices for a phone that didn’t have a foldable screen.

Microsoft then fumbled supporting the device once it was on the market. Surface Duo launched on Android 10, and received just two major software updates before Microsoft dropped support for it. Surface Duo 2 launched with Android 11, and has only received Android 12L as a major OS update so far. Android 13 has been out for a year, and Android 14 is set to launch imminently.

So far, it looks like Microsoft has no plans to launch Android 13 or Android 14 for Surface Duo 2, which is wild and sets a distressing precedent for future Surface phone hardware. Microsoft’s inability to support Surface Duo with timely Android OS releases tells you everything you need to know about Microsoft’s commitment to Surface Duo.

Looking to the future

(Image credit: HP)

Ultimately, the dual-screen vision Microsoft had failed spectacularly. At this point, there are no plans to deliver dual-screen support in the way Windows 10X did on Windows 11, and most OEMs have all but given up on their dual-screen designs. Lenovo is the only one to have shipped a dual-screen laptop in the last couple of years, and they had to do most of the heavy lifting software wise to get that experience to work.

Even with Microsoft’s vision dead, and its lead now on the way to Amazon, it appears the future now leans on true foldable displays. We’re seeing it on phones, and we’re starting to see it in the PC space too. LG, ASUS, Lenovo, and HP have all unveiled foldable PCs with Windows 11, and there are more on the way. Now, all we need is for Microsoft to support them natively with Windows, and perhaps launch a foldable Surface PC of its own.

Zac Bowden
Senior Editor

Zac Bowden is a Senior Editor at Windows Central. Bringing you exclusive coverage into the world of Windows on PCs, tablets, phones, and more. Also an avid collector of rare Microsoft prototype devices! Keep in touch on Twitter and Threads

  • taynjack
    A long, long time ago
    I can still remember how Microsoft
    Used to make me smile
    And I knew if they had a chance
    Microsoft could make those people dance
    And maybe they'd be happy for a while

    But Satya made me shiver
    With every paper you'd(windows central) deliver
    Bad news on the doorstep
    I couldn't take one more step
    I can't remember if I screamed
    When Panos' chose himself be weaned
    Something touched me deep inside
    The day Microsoft died


    My first day back to Windowscentral in several months and all I see is the death of Microsoft as I once knew it. It seems they peaked in 2019 then completely fell apart. Panos, the last hope of anything creative coming from Microsoft has left the company. Surface Duo won't make version 3, which means I won't ever own one. Satya further streamlining the Surface line means it's apparent that Surface Studio will never reach it's epic potential. I find myself with nothing left to root for at Microsoft. I remember the days of near constant news of Cortana, new Windows Mobile features, the phones, the Band, the Invoke, the home screen control thingy that never happened, the Surface Neo, the Surface Duo - windows edition. I remember so many features on my windows phone that STILL don't exist in other operating systems. Something so simple as sending a hands free text while driving was solved with Cortana and is still complete garbage on other systems compared to how seamlessly Cortana could handle those tasks. Things like using my phone's camera to pan around me to see what restaurants are nearby. There used to be something to look forward to. Now, I guess I can look forward to all the time I've gotten back as I no longer have reasons to come to sites like this. My condolences to the writers here, but there just isn't the compelling stories Microsoft used to generate to keep me coming back daily, if ever again.

    This comment room is as empty as ever. It seems everyone else already left. So, I'll shut the lights out and lock up on my way out. Farewell to anyone who is still left here.
    Reply
  • FarStrider2001
    Not sure im surprised anymore think surface mini, wp, etc all potential wasted
    Reply
  • Jcmg62
    It's a heck of a shame, where we are today with the surface line.

    After the roller coaster ride, and ultimate disappointment, of the Windows Phone fiasco, we needed a beacon of light from Microsoft, and the Surface brand was just that.

    We were told from the very start that the surface brand existed to push boundaries, develop new form factors, and showcase everything that windows could be.

    It existed to ignite imagination in hardware design and generate excitement in windows.

    That's gone.

    Now we're left with overpriced, underpowered laptops, and two-in-one designs that have been around for over ten years.

    Its impossible to come up with brand new form factors every year, and of course every company needs to sell products and make money, and for those reasons I'd always be willing to buy a surface laptop or pro, because the designs are proven and they work well, but that should never have stopped Microsoft from wanting to push new boundaries.

    The announcement, and subsequent cancellation of the Neo was hugely disappointing. It signalled the very last effort that Microsoft made to push hardware innovation.

    I have no idea where the brand goes from here, but up until two weeks ago, I never saw myself using anything other than a surface device.

    Now I'm not so sure.
    Reply
  • naddy69
    Such doom and gloom here. Why?

    MS is far from dead. In fact, MS is thriving. Growing. Making tons of profits.

    In part, because they stopped selling products that no one wants to buy. They are no longer losing billions on phones and music streaming services. And on and on. They are concentrating on their core business. Which IS business.

    What are you "blaming" the CEO for? Making MS profitable? That's his job: to kill products that are losing money. If he let windows phones continue to lose a billion dollars a year for 5 more years, the board would have fired him and hired someone who WOULD kill the products that are losing money.

    I know I sound like a broken record here. But the fact is, MS will never be the consumer products company you all wanted to see.

    If you want laptops and phones and speakers and tablets and watches that all work great together, we already have Apple for that. Why should Microsoft have to duplicate all of that?

    We also have Samsung for phones and tablets and headphones and TVs and microwave ovens. Do you expect Microsoft to duplicate all of that?

    The "Microsoft you once knew" only existed for about 5 years. It was an experiment that failed. Failed very badly. Technicolor crash and burn. Due to management that believed Apple was their competition. That management is long gone.

    Microsoft is now 48 years old. The phones, the music, the stores are all gone. They are not coming back. Mourn if you must, but the fact is the future of MS has never been brighter. The current leadership is doing the right things to make the future bright.
    Reply
  • Arun Topez
    naddy69 said:
    Such doom and gloom here. Why?

    MS is far from dead. In fact, MS is thriving. Growing. Making tons of profits.

    In part, because they stopped selling products that no one wants to buy. They are no longer losing billions on phones and music streaming services. And on and on. They are concentrating on their core business. Which IS business.

    What are you "blaming" the CEO for? Making MS profitable? That's his job: to kill products that are losing money. If he let windows phones continue to lose a billion dollars a year for 5 more years, the board would have fired him and hired someone who WOULD kill the products that are losing money.

    I know I sound like a broken record here. But the fact is, MS will never be the consumer products company you all wanted to see.

    If you want laptops and phones and speakers and tablets and watches that all work great together, we already have Apple for that. Why should Microsoft have to duplicate all of that?

    We also have Samsung for phones and tablets and headphones and TVs and microwave ovens. Do you expect Microsoft to duplicate all of that?

    The "Microsoft you once knew" only existed for about 5 years. It was an experiment that failed. Failed very badly. Technicolor crash and burn. Due to management that believed Apple was their competition. That management is long gone.

    Microsoft is now 48 years old. The phones, the music, the stores are all gone. They are not coming back. Mourn if you must, but the fact is the future of MS has never been brighter. The current leadership is doing the right things to make the future bright.
    Are you one of their board members? lol... the doom and gloom is from their actual customers who were diehard fans of theirs and who loved their innovation and designs. Now they've become the opposite of what they touted ("To make Microsoft a brand that people love and want to use, not just have to use"). And with the way they've recently treated their customers (not supporting their expensive devices, cancelling services, using customers are QA), and employees (laying off thousands, cutting local marketing and sales teams, putting all their priorities in AI instead of distributing it across all their entities resulting in people losing work, lowering employee review scores to avoid paying them more), etc. it's all about profits with no heart. That's why they've lost fans, and they'll continue to lose customers this way. If one of their most passionate leads left due to these changes and not being able to innovate and make the Microsoft, Windows and Surface brands light us up like it used to, then it's only going to be stale from here like Apple is doing.
    Reply
  • Arun Topez
    Oh man... watching that Neo intro video above just gave me goosebumps again, especially when the keyboard sneaked out and seeing the little details in the OS. It really sucks that they couldn't make it work, but if they really invested into it I'm sure they could have. I don't know if I could trust Surface anymore going forward. I really want to, but they keep repeating the same mistakes of putting the majority of their investments into one thing (before it was cloud, now it's AI). I miss the days when the Windows and Office and Surface were hero investments for them, which is why those products haven't changed much today because they're solid enough to last this long. But the lack of innovation and support and consumer love... it just feels so ingenuine.
    Reply
  • kltye
    naddy69 said:
    Such doom and gloom here. Why?

    MS is far from dead. In fact, MS is thriving. Growing. Making tons of profits.

    In part, because they stopped selling products that no one wants to buy. They are no longer losing billions on phones and music streaming services. And on and on. They are concentrating on their core business. Which IS business.

    What are you "blaming" the CEO for? Making MS profitable? That's his job: to kill products that are losing money. If he let windows phones continue to lose a billion dollars a year for 5 more years, the board would have fired him and hired someone who WOULD kill the products that are losing money.

    I know I sound like a broken record here. But the fact is, MS will never be the consumer products company you all wanted to see.

    If you want laptops and phones and speakers and tablets and watches that all work great together, we already have Apple for that. Why should Microsoft have to duplicate all of that?

    We also have Samsung for phones and tablets and headphones and TVs and microwave ovens. Do you expect Microsoft to duplicate all of that?

    The "Microsoft you once knew" only existed for about 5 years. It was an experiment that failed. Failed very badly. Technicolor crash and burn. Due to management that believed Apple was their competition. That management is long gone.

    Microsoft is now 48 years old. The phones, the music, the stores are all gone. They are not coming back. Mourn if you must, but the fact is the future of MS has never been brighter. The current leadership is doing the right things to make the future bright.
    Sure, if you want Microsoft to be the next IBM, then it's wildly successful at that. Some of us care about more than pure profits and shareholder value, though. The fact is, Microsoft has always been at the cusp of doing something great, but they pull the plug too soon.

    As for the silly "we have Apple" comment - why then do we have other brand vehicles if BMW exists for the luxury market? Why have other EVs if Tesla is around? Why have laptops from Dell if Lenovo exists? Should we forget about Sam's Club because Costco is around? 🙄
    Reply
  • Cmndr_Bytes
    taynjack said:
    A long, long time ago
    I can still remember how Microsoft
    Used to make me smile
    And I knew if they had a chance
    Microsoft could make those people dance
    And maybe they'd be happy for a while

    But Satya made me shiver
    With every paper you'd(windows central) deliver
    Bad news on the doorstep
    I couldn't take one more step
    I can't remember if I screamed
    When Panos' chose himself be weaned
    Something touched me deep inside
    The day Microsoft died


    My first day back to Windowscentral in several months and all I see is the death of Microsoft as I once knew it. It seems they peaked in 2019 then completely fell apart. Panos, the last hope of anything creative coming from Microsoft has left the company. Surface Duo won't make version 3, which means I won't ever own one. Satya further streamlining the Surface line means it's apparent that Surface Studio will never reach it's epic potential. I find myself with nothing left to root for at Microsoft. I remember the days of near constant news of Cortana, new Windows Mobile features, the phones, the Band, the Invoke, the home screen control thingy that never happened, the Surface Neo, the Surface Duo - windows edition. I remember so many features on my windows phone that STILL don't exist in other operating systems. Something so simple as sending a hands free text while driving was solved with Cortana and is still complete garbage on other systems compared to how seamlessly Cortana could handle those tasks. Things like using my phone's camera to pan around me to see what restaurants are nearby. There used to be something to look forward to. Now, I guess I can look forward to all the time I've gotten back as I no longer have reasons to come to sites like this. My condolences to the writers here, but there just isn't the compelling stories Microsoft used to generate to keep me coming back daily, if ever again.

    This comment room is as empty as ever. It seems everyone else already left. So, I'll shut the lights out and lock up on my way out. Farewell to anyone who is still left here.

    I made a very similar comment last week. https://forums.windowscentral.com/threads/if-this-is-the-future-of-surface-i-see-why-panos-panay-left-microsoft.527052/post-3851597I miss the days of being excited about what Microsoft was doing. When they were truly innovating and not giving up on everything.
    Reply
  • Iamdumbguy
    You know what's a dual screen device? Plugging in a monitor to a laptop. Connect two monitors to a desktop PC? That's a dual screen device. Microsoft didn't give a shit about those though. The focus on "devices" and hardware here is frustrating.

    All you really needed to know to know that Surface Neo was vaporware and would always be just that, is that Microsoft has released more than 9 Surface Pro models, each one touting pen support and yet, the only Microsoft pen-focused app, OneNote, is abandonware.

    Microsoft has put its foot down and is refusing to make software for anything but a browser. That is the writing on the wall for any Microsoft "device".
    Reply
  • The Werewolf
    You've nailed my reactions to it perfectly.

    For me, the Neo was the leaked Microsoft Courier from the 2010s, showing a whole new vision of how to interact with computers. Even many of the software elements in the Neo video felt lifted from the Courier one.

    It's similar to devices shown (simulated) in the various Office productivity videos of the time as well.

    Ands the Duo mess. SO, many bad decisions there (and I have a first gen Duo). Microsoft forgot the first rule "You don't get a second chance to make first impressions..." The whole presentation really felt like Microsoft (or Panay) trying to out Apple Apple with the whole "we spent so much time on the hinge and getting that 'thunk' closing sound perfect" in order to justify a US$1500 price that should have been $750 tops give how much was missing from it... and that it basically was just two $300 phones glued together... badly.

    I STILL want a Neo. Other OEMs are making two screen devices, but they are all two 12"+ screens making them unwieldly as laptops and equally awkward as electronic smart-books (as per the Courier). This needs to be two 8" screens. But it also needs to be at a price point that lets enough people buy it to create a market.

    I feel like getting two Surface Gos and gluing them together :)
    Reply