Microsoft Teams hit with a class action lawsuit for allegedly collecting voice data — violating Illinois biometric privacy laws

Microsoft Teams app icon with Illinois state flag
(Image credit: Getty Images | Bloomberg)

On February 5, 2026, five Illinois residents filed a class action lawsuit against Microsoft in a federal court in Washington. The plaintiffs, including Alex Basich, Kristin Bondlow, and three others, claimed that Microsoft, through its video conferencing platform (Teams), was illegally collecting voice data in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).

The class action suit claims that the software giant illegally collected voice data through Teams' real-time transcription feature, which was shipped in 2021 and captures speakers' voices during online meetings and even assesses pitch, tone, and timbre to easily identify who made a certain comment or idea.

Microsoft never informed Teams meeting participants that their biometrics, such as voiceprints, were being collected during Microsoft Teams Meetings. Microsoft also failed to inform Teams meeting participants of the specific purpose for the collection or storage of their biometrics and failed to provide meeting participants with a schedule setting out the length of time which those biometrics would be collected, stored, used, and destroyed.

Microsoft class action lawsuit

The plaintiffs seek to represent a class of Microsoft Teams users in Illinois whose biometric data was unlawfully collected through the platform’s transcription feature beginning March 1, 2021.

The class action lawsuit requests either actual damages or statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation, whichever is greater. If the court determines that Microsoft willfully or recklessly violated the BIPA, damages could increase to $5,000 per violation.

Elsewhere, an Austrian privacy regulator has ruled that Microsoft illegally set tracking cookies on a school‑issued device used by a child, even though the issue stemmed from how the school deployed Microsoft 365 services rather than anything Microsoft directly controlled.

A pink banner that says "What do you think?" and shows a dial pointing to a mid-range hue on a gradient.

Should companies face higher penalties when they intentionally misuse biometric data? Let me know in the comments.


Click to join us on r/WindowsCentral

Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more.


Kevin Okemwa
Contributor

Kevin Okemwa is a seasoned tech journalist based in Nairobi, Kenya with lots of experience covering the latest trends and developments in the industry at Windows Central. With a passion for innovation and a keen eye for detail, he has written for leading publications such as OnMSFT, MakeUseOf, and Windows Report, providing insightful analysis and breaking news on everything revolving around the Microsoft ecosystem. While AFK and not busy following the ever-emerging trends in tech, you can find him exploring the world or listening to music.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.