Microsoft and Xbox announced 'Marvel's Blade' at The Game Awards — but could it also be coming to PlayStation?

Marvel's Blade by Arkane and Xbox
(Image credit: Microsoft)

The Game Awards wrapped up last night (or early morning if you're a Brit, like moi), and within, Microsoft and Xbox had an impressive showing throughout. Microsoft announced OD, from Hideo Kojima, alongside Marvel's Blade, built by Arkane Lyon of Dishonored fame. Baldur's Gate 3 also shadow dropped onto Xbox during the show, after a lengthy period of optimization for the Xbox Series S. 

However, controversy swirls. 

When we wrote up our Blade announcement article, we did so based on prior knowledge of the event. While our sources were 100% correct about it being Blade, we have yet to have 100% confirmation that it will be Xbox exclusive, despite it being suggested to us that it is. Xbox is building it, right? And it seems to address the criticism of Microsoft not having an answer to PlayStation's Spider-Man, which remains one of the most compelling reasons to get a PS5 in general. However, as you can see based on the trailer above, there's no mention of platforms whatsoever. There's also no mention of platforms on the Blade website, which describes the game as thus: 

"In Marvel’s Blade, Eric Brooks is the legendary Daywalker, half-man, half-vampire torn between the warm society of the living and the rushing power of the undead. From Bethesda and Arkane Lyon, Marvel’s Blade is a mature, single-player, third-person game set in the heart of Paris, now in development in collaboration with Marvel Games."

The lack of information is puzzling. If Blade is Xbox exclusive, wouldn't Microsoft be yelling it from the rafters? If Blade isn't Xbox exclusive, isn't it just deceptive and seeding confusion by not telling people upfront? Either way, we've asked Microsoft to offer a comment and clarify, but here's a few possible scenarios. 

  • Microsoft and Disney are still in negotiations. Perhaps Microsoft and Disney are still negotiating over how much each will profit from the venture, and how much of a premium Microsoft may or may not have to pay for the exclusivity badge. 
  • Previous court discussions suggest that Machine Games' and Disney's Indiana Jones game will be Xbox exclusive, but there's been absolutely no marketing-oriented official confirmation yet on that either. 
  • Perhaps Microsoft thinks speculation over platforms will help drive discussion and thus viral marketing. I somehow doubt this, since right now it's just creating frustration and negative vibes — people don't know what to expect of the Xbox platform. 
  • Perhaps it really is coming to PlayStation as well, and while it would be great for as many people to get to play the game possible, it would also just further erodes the Xbox platform's credibility and competitiveness.
  • Xbox previously used arguments in its Activision court cases that its games are more accessible than ever, with the affordable Xbox Series S, with Xbox Cloud Gaming on phones and TVs, Xbox Game Pass, and PC day-and-date launches.
  • It could also be this: Microsoft is still fighting the FTC over its Activision-Blizzard deal in the United States. The FTC's arguments hinge on the idea that Microsoft could "withhold" games from PlayStation, such as Call of Duty. Microsoft may be acting via an abundance of care as to not add fuel to the FTC's spurious arguments, given the fact that exclusive games are how companies compete in the console space. 
  • It should also be noted, PlayStation tweeted (X'd?) about every game from The Game Awards, except Hideo Kojima's OD, and Arkane's Blade. 

In any case, the confusion threatens to overshadow the teaser trailer itself. Too often does it feel like Microsoft and Xbox announcements come with some kind of confusion or caveat attached, whereas Xbox's competitors are by and large far more consistent with messaging and delivery. 

Microsoft and Xbox are consistently inconsistent

(Image credit: Windows Central | Bing Image Creator)

It was only last week that Microsoft created a wave of confusion when Tim Stuart, Xbox's CFO, claimed to Wells Fargo investors that Microsoft is essentially going to do a Sega and go third-party, with its first-party games coming to PlayStation alongside Xbox Game Pass. Then, in an exclusive interview with us, Xbox lead Phil Spencer suggested that isn't going to happen. But now, we're back to square one again. 

Xbox detractors salivate at the idea of Microsoft quitting the console race, and bringing their games to PlayStation (often while also simultaneously claiming Xbox games are bad and they don't want them, huh). Xbox fans are also similarly nervous that Microsoft would eventually seek to go third-party and quit the hardware race, betraying decades of digital investment in Microsoft platforms. Microsoft is, of course, no stranger to pulling the rug out from under people (cough, Windows Phone, cough), and Microsoft's vast size and diverse portfolio makes them less dependent on any one department. If PlayStation shut down its console gaming division it would irreparably damage Sony. If Microsoft shut down its console gaming division, it wouldn't even be a blip on investors' radars. 

Of course, these are extensive extrapolations from a single first-party game potentially going multiplatform. Microsoft is, of course, more multiplatform than ever already. With Activision-Blizzard now acquired, Microsoft becomes one of PlayStation's biggest customers, with Diablo, Overwatch, and Call of Duty in tow. This could all also just be a consequence of the on-going FTC litigation, with Microsoft eager to not show that it wants to build exclusive games for the Xbox platform via its acquisitions — despite, of course, PlayStation and Nintendo doing exactly the same thing. Microsoft also hasn't confirmed if Hideo Kojima's "OD" is console exclusive to Xbox, either, and that's a second-party type deal. Microsoft could easily point to Death Stranding as an example of Sony signing those kinds of deals too. 

Right now, if I had to guess, it would be that Blade is indeed Xbox exclusive, and that it could be on-going negotiations, or FTC shenanigans obscuring the messaging. What ever the truth may be, it's unfair that Xbox hardware fans have to live in this world of uncertainty, and something Microsoft should work to alleviate. 

What do YOU think? Hit the comments. 

Jez Corden
Co-Managing Editor

Jez Corden is a Managing Editor at Windows Central, focusing primarily on all things Xbox and gaming. Jez is known for breaking exclusive news and analysis as relates to the Microsoft ecosystem while being powered by tea. Follow on Twitter @JezCorden and listen to his XB2 Podcast, all about, you guessed it, Xbox!

  • fjtorres5591
    You missed one explanation: Microsoft is trolling the Sony faithful, like they did with STARFIELD. Kinda like Lucy and Charlie Brown. "This time they won't go exclusive." And then when it comes out...

    Also, on the FTC, that horse is dead. No need to beat it anymore.

    The DC bureaucracts have a bigger problem on their hands: their entire internal court system is under attack in various lawsuits at SCOTUS and elsewhere as unconstitutional. And the argument is persuasive if a long story.

    An online search for "administrative courts unconstitutional" will bring out some details.
    Reply
  • Jez Corden
    fjtorres5591 said:
    You missed one explanation: Microsoft is trolling the Sony faithful, like they did with STARFIELD. Kinda like Lucy and Charlie Brown. "This time they won't go exclusive." And then when it comes out...

    Also, on the FTC, that horse is dead. No need to beat it anymore.

    The DC bureaucracts have a bigger problem on their hands: their entire internal court system is under attack in various lawsuits at SCOTUS and elsewhere as unconstitutional. And the argument is persuasive if a long story.

    An online search for "administrative courts unconstitutional" will bring out some details.
    the ftc horse is beaten so hard its like a red bloody paste in the ground at this point lol.

    and idk, i did mention that they could be keeping it obscure for "viral marketing" discussion but i think it's a stretch. ive not heard that microsoft does that kinda thing.
    Reply
  • bazanime
    Sony owns Spiderman so they can milk it as much as they desire. Marvel seems more enamoured with Sony since they already have an existing relationship so they can release the Wolverine game as a PS exclusive. Xbox is not in that club, so maybe Blade won't be an exclusive, but it would be nice.
    That said, Xbox has so much scrutiny from lawmakers and detractors, that MS is trying to walk a tightrope to keep from more legal battles or claims whilst keeping its user base happy.
    Alas, It is extremely frowned upon when Xbox has an exclusive, that folks would get the PC release if it exists or forgo it altogether. These same people would sell their kidneys and offspring to get ps5 for one game even ifs a glorified DLC or remake.
    Reply
  • rokstud
    bazanime said:
    Sony owns Spiderman so they can milk it as much as they desire. Marvel seems more enamoured with Sony since they already have an existing relationship so they can release the Wolverine game as a PS exclusive. Xbox is not in that club, so maybe Blade won't be an exclusive, but it would be nice.
    That said, Xbox has so much scrutiny from lawmakers and detractors, that MS is trying to walk a tightrope to keep from more legal battles or claims whilst keeping its user base happy.
    Alas, It is extremely frowned upon when Xbox has an exclusive, that folks would get the PC release if it exists or forgo it altogether. These same people would sell their kidneys and offspring to get ps5 for one game even ifs a glorified DLC or remake.
    Marvel has relationships across all platforms and publishers. Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3 was exclusively released on Switch, while Midnight Suns (3rd party but also included Spider-man, Wolverine and Blade) was released on all platforms.
    If a company gets the rights to characters, then they can make it exclusive or release it on other platforms. Spider-man and Wolverine will be exclusive to Sony (since their studios are making the game), and Blade will be exclusive to the MS ecosystem for the same reason.
    Reply
  • BINARYGOD
    "Too often does it feel like Microsoft and Xbox announcements come with some kind of confusion or caveat attached, whereas Xbox's competitors are by and large far more consistent with messaging and delivery. "

    Actually, this doesn't happen the vast majority of the time (really, if you factor out some vagueness around purchases, there is nearly none) - this talking point only spring from your fingers because you xbots have weirdly taken to using a select few PS fanboy talking points.

    What worse than some vagueness that sometimes happens is Sony getting people to lie and play coy with their timed exclusives, acting from months like the 1-year deal doesn't exist or doesn't mean an Xbox port may even happen (which is stupid, what did Sony pay for if there is no near guarantee of an Xbox port?), for example.
    Reply