(Ed Note: Malatesta, who has used IE6 on the Sprint Treo Pro, chimes in with his thoughts on the recent question of what it means that it comes on the CDMA Treo Pro on WM 6.1 but no upgrade path will be available for others. I have just received a review unit of the Sprint Treo Pro which may include some improvements over the original ROM - stay tuned for that. In the meantime, Mal tells us "what we need to know" and it's not what you might expect. --Dieter)
Microsoft has revealed details on the much-hyped Internet Explorer Mobile 6 (IEM6), which is also making its official debut within the next 2 weeks with the Sprint Treo Pro (no word on Alltel’s version).
To recap what we know and has happened so far with IE6, lets go down memory lane:
- March/April ’08: Adobe licenses Flash Lite to MS for future version of IEM; Announced at CTIA (opens in new tab)
- Nov. ’08: WMExperts gets screenshots of IEM6 on Treo Pro; Microsoft announces (again) IEM6 at Tech•Ed EMEA (opens in new tab)
- Dec. ’08: IEM6 gets cooked into ROMs
- Feb. ’09: An even newer version of IEM6 for WM6.5 is demoed at MWC; leaked a few days later
- March ’09: Sprint Treo Pro to be first official device with IEM6
Yes folks, that was one year in the making for what is arguable a very marginal update. Now in fairness to Microsoft, there are actually a ton of changes to the internal code of IEM6. But for the end-user, it remains to be seen if these changes are significant.
Read on to catch up on Microsoft's latest browser and our hands-on opinion!
The big news of course is the incorporation of Adobe’s Flash Lite 3.1 into the browser. Finally you can now go to Mobile YouTube and watch embedded videos right in your browser (see it in action above). Having used IEM6 when I had the Sprint Treo Pro, I can tell you this feature for m.youtube is actually a lot of fun and it works very well.
However, not all Flash sites work so hot with the new browser. In fact, some don’t work at all (error: your version of Flash Lite is not compatible) or when it does work, it is scaled so huge as to not be viewable nor manageable (over at Ruotsalainen’s excellent blog, you can see his results from various streaming sites—not pretty).
Some other additions were H.264, Website Meta language support, better “touch optimized” navigation, AJAX and noticeably absent from the final version, no Silverlight support.
Oh, did we also mention the mouse cursor? IEM6 is now like Skyfire: you have a mouse cursor to move over the screen as opposed to the older “link hopping” option, which is now gone. Ugh.
The other big news was the announcement by MS back on November that an upgrade-path to IEM6 will NOT be happening for a few reasons, including the need for a 400 mhz-plus processor, certain memory requirements and the unwieldy installation just did not make a simple .cab file installation possible. That is why people have had to “cook” a version into ROM in order to use it.
Now comes word from MS that it basically “refreshed” WM6.1 with a new AKU build (v1.4; older WM6.1 was basically AKU 1.0) to accommodate their new browser. (There are some other notable changes in AKU 1.4 not related to the browser, like changes in the Outlook menu system, too.)
Personal Experience: Careful what you ask for
As previously mentioned, I had the opportunity to use IEM6 for 30 days. Full disclosure: I actually really like using IEM5 on my previous devices for viewing mobile sites—it’s right quick and doesn’t take too long to load (for full sites, I prefer Opera Mini or Skyfire), so I’m not hater on IEM.
Having said that, IEM6 is flat out terrible mostly for UI reasons but also for slow performance ones too. For one, they abandoned the “single column” view whereby the browser stacks everything so only scrolling vertically is required. With IEM6 you pretty much have to scroll vertically and horizontally no matter what the site, including mobile-formatted ones.
No surprise, it is also slower to load, what with having to load Flash Lite 3.1 every time. Actual speed of rendering was not noticeably different and a real pet peeve: when you hit “Stop” it doesn’t actually stop the page from loading, at least not within a realistic amount of time. The browser still hangs and chokes on large sites and the overall feels is just worse in comparison to IEM5 (though the new download screen is a bit nicer).
Sure Mobile YouTube works well, but honestly there are much better solutions for streaming that or any other sites (e.g. Kinoma Play, Core Player) and unless you are a YouTube nut, it’s just not a big deal. In short, streaming Flash is still a pain and not at all an enjoyable experience.
I’ll leave the final word on this with Ruotsalainen, who said this about IEM6 recently:
In conclusion, perhaps in WM6.5 IEM6 (which is a newer build) will perform and be much better than the current version, in fact we can give them the benefit of the doubt (see a video of it in action here). But if you are pining over the current IEM6, in short don’t. It’s not very good and I’m happy to be back to the older version.
Windows Central Newsletter
Get the best of Windows Central in in your inbox, every day!
Can we please (and by "we," I mean All Websites that Report on Windows Mobile) get the whole "IE 6"/"IE Mobile 6" issue straight? More mainstream press is latching onto these articles that just call it "IE 6" and saying ignorant things like "OMG they're porting an 8-year old horrible browser to Windows Mobile and calling it an improvement". They're using it as further reason to poke fun at WM. PLEASE try to stick to including the word "Mobile" in there.
Well, actually, the reason we refer to it at IE6 (and they're not all great): 1. It's shorter
2. Microsoft itself tends to get fuzzy on that naming -- perhaps on purpose -- because they're trying to piggy back.
2. Is it IE6 Mobile? IE Mobile (version whatever)? It's unclear what the official branding is supposed to be. Both of those are bad reasons, but one GOOD reason is this: 3. IE Mobile 6 (or whatever) IS based on Internet Explorer 6's rendering engine. So when media outlets point out that "they're porting an 8-year old horrible browser to Windows Mobile and calling it an improvement," they're at least partially right. :( Anyway -- your point is a good one, we'll make an effort to stick "mobile" in there from now on.
Really?! It's based on Internet Explorer 6's rendering engine? If that's true, I heartily apologize. I assumed Microsoft wouldn't be that stupid :( Not that I don't believe you, but could you please post a link where this is stated, hopefully with their reasoning for doing this? Thanks, and sorry for jumping to conclusions.
I don't get confused too often when it comes to WM but here I am a bit confused. What were we looking at with the IE version shown just recently with the large (Opera like) icons and good rendering performance as opposed to what was shown above?
That's the same basic browser -- IE Mobile 6 -- (perhaps with some improvements) re-skinned for Windows Mobile 6.5
The recently released Touch Pro and Diamond rom upgrades were aku 1.4 but no ie6. Does that mean its never coming?
Hey, stop being Coy! Mystery is good in the bedroom but not on tech site! you have the Sprint Treo Pro review unit, Let's have the remaining memory. Give up the goods. 45 mb? We promise to still read the review (twice in fact) when you get around to it! I promise in fact to whisper "Deiter and Mal sent me" at the Sprint counter on the 15.
Funny. That browser looked quite smooth on the Toshiba TG01:
http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=2719 Have you guys forgotten this?
@wreiad, so your point is that on a nex-gen chipset (Snapdragon) running at or near 1 Ghz, some components of Windows Mobile (IEM6) actually run "smooth". Wow, great. That does a lot for all the 512mhz devices currently on the market and those coming onto the market (Touch Pro 2, Diamond 2, etc.). Still not impressed.
Thank you for notice. I will keep it in mind
Thank you for signing up to Windows Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.