Skip to main content

LG's 15-inch Gram will set you back by at least $1,100

Pricing details for the 15-inch LG Gram have been announced by the company. Should you be holding out for the MacBook lookalike, you'll need to part with at least $1,100 which will bag you the configuration with an Intel Core i5 processor. Opting for the i7 build will bring the price up to $1,500, but even at these rather high-end prices, the LG Gram is a gorgeous and light laptop that'll be well worth the investment.

For specifications, there's a 1080p display, 256GB or 512GB SSD, 8GB of RAM and a USB Type-C, USB 3.0, micro-USB and HDMI ports. While it's clear LG are positioning the Gram to compete against Apple, unfortunately, the display is only 1080p and falls short of Retina. We'd like have seen at least a 1440p screen.

Rich Edmonds
Rich Edmonds

Rich Edmonds is Senior Editor of PC hardware at Windows Central, covering everything related to PC components and NAS. He's been involved in technology for more than a decade and knows a thing or two about the magic inside a PC chassis. You can follow him over on Twitter at @RichEdmonds.

10 Comments
  • MacBook's don't have number pads.
  • They don't have alot of other stuff thats awesome as well.
  • Which CPU? Posted from Windows Central for Windows 10
  • Not worth it. Too heavily oriced for the specs. Surface is better value for money compared to this Posted from Windows Central for Windows 10
  • Really comes down to size. This is the only 15" Ultrabook with a number pad. Surface is great but if you don't have an external screen and keyboard then this is a good option.
  • The lightness is unbelievable. There's no MacBook/PC like Gram. Too bad the battery life and sturdiness are not as well-rated.
  • $1100 for only 8GB of RAM and a 1080p screen? Way overpriced.
  • For that price, it ought to come pre-loaded with a couple ounces of top-shelf weed!
  • What's the other mobile device that has a keyboard??? Makay Chapulets | MTN CCR
    Posted from my Lumia 640XL running Windows 10.
  • It's a shame these are all non touch displays