Surface Pro (5th Gen) review: A 2-in-1 tablet you'll actually want to use

Ever since the Surface Pro was revealed in 2012 Microsoft has been trying to convince the world that a PC tablet with a floppy keyboard should be your laptop of choice. With the Surface Pro 3 and 4, that vision started coming into focus despite a few flaws.

Windows Central Recommended Award

After spending a few weeks with the new Surface Pro for 2017 (a.k.a. Surface Pro 5), I think Microsoft's dream is now fully realized. Never has the Surface Pro felt so complete, so well-rounded and balanced and it rightfully earns your attention.

About this review

Microsoft supplied a loaner Surface Pro for this review. The unit tested features a Core i7-7660U processor, with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage priced at $2,199. The package also included the Alcantara Surface Type Cover ($159) and new Surface Pen ($99) for a total of $2,457. Starting price of the new Surface Pro is $799 for a Core m3 with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of storage and maxes out a Core i7 with 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage for $2,699 (plus Type Cover and Surface Pen).

See at Microsoft (opens in new tab)

Related: Surface Pro keyboards that cost less than Microsoft's Type Covers

All the power

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 technical specifications

Like previous Surface Pro releases, Microsoft is offering numerous configurations based on three types of processors and various RAM and storage options. The display and chassis are otherwise the same on all versions.

The processors are all seventh generation Intel "Kaby Lake" chips, and the high-end Core i7 version includes upgrade Iris Plus HD640 Graphics giving that that configuration even more power.

Surface Pro 2017

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Display12.3-inch Pixel Sense display
10 point multi-touch
Display Resolution2736 x 1824 (267 PPI)
Aspect Ratio: 3:2
SoftwareWindows 10
ProcessorSeventh Gen Intel Core m3 7Y30
Seventh Gen Intel Core i5-7300U
Seventh Gen Intel Core i7-7660U
Storage128GB, 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB Solid State Drive (SSD)
Memory4GB, 8GB or 16GB RAM
1866Mhz LPDDR3
GraphicsCore m3 and Core i5: Intel HD graphics 620
Core i7: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Rear Camera8.0MP autofocus camera with 1080p HD video
Front Camera5.0MP camera with 1080p HD video
Windows Hello face-authentication
SpeakersStereo speakers with Dolby Audio Premium
PortsOne full-size USB 3.0
Mini DisplayPort
Headset jack
Surface Connect
microSDXC card reader
SensorsAmbient light sensor
NetworkWi-Fi: IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac compatible
Bluetooth Wireless 4.1 technology
SecurityTPM chip for enterprise security
Battery Life13.5 hours of use
PenSurface Pen
Weight1.69 lbs to 1.73 lbs (768 g to 784 g)
Dimensions11.50 inches x 7.9 inches x 0.33 inches (292 mm x 201 mm x 8.5 mm)

The catch with any Surface Pro is that the practically essential Surface Type Cover is not included. That adds $129 for the Surface Pro 4 era covers (Black, Blue, Red, Teal, Bright Blue) to $159 for the new Surface Pro Signature Type Cover (opens in new tab) with Alcantara (Burgundy, Cobalt Blue, or Platinum) to the final cost.

Additionally, for the first time, Microsoft is not including the Surface Pen in the box. Microsoft says that only 30 percent of Surface buyers used the pen, and the fully upgraded pen increased in cost from $59 to $99. Plus now you can mix-and-match colors between the Pen and Type Covers.

Finally, the Core m3 and now Core i5 versions of Surface Pro are both completely fanless. Only the Core i7 maintains a fan, albeit redesigned and now quieter. Towards the Fall, Microsoft is expected to release another model of Surface Pro that supports 4G LTE.

Surface Pro 2017

Familiar but all-new

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 design

Not much has changed regarding the design of the Surface Pro 2017, and in many ways, it still looks a lot like the Surface Pro 3. That's a good thing, as the overall execution and layout are perfect — except maybe for that headphone jack that near the top left corner of the display.

The chassis is still magnesium and solidly built with no flex or creaks. The power and volume control keys are found on the upper left of the tablet – they feel a little more stable this time around too, with less rattle. On the right-hand side are the ports: one USB Type-A, one mini-DisplayPort, and one Surface Connect for plugging into power and the optional Surface Dock.

Not much for ports, but it is a tablet after all. No Type-C will bother some.

Somewhat controversially, there is no USB Type-C slot. Microsoft plans to release an adapter that fits into the Surface Connect port later this year though as a compromise. That dongle will reconfigure that power and data port into USB Type-C for those who want it. I won't dwell on the topic as it has been discussed endlessly, but if you want Type-C and Thunderbolt 3, you may want to look at offerings from HP or Dell instead.

Why Microsoft's new Surface Pro doesn't have a USB Type-C port

There are, however, numerous smaller changes that help make the 2017 Surface Pro even better than older models. These include a restructured chassis with smoother and more rounded edges, thinner radial vents with a new "whisper quiet" thermal system, a kickstand that now tilts back a full 165 degrees, and blacked-out Windows Hello IR lenses that better blend into the bezel. All told, we're looking at more than 800 customized internal parts.

Not much has changed with the design of the Surface Pro 2017. That's a good thing.

Although these alterations may seem trivial on paper when using the Surface Pro daily, I appreciate them nonetheless. The less harsh edges and marginally slimmer vent around that edge help the new Surface Pro feel like a more typical tablet, which betrays the powerful Core i7 processor and 16GB of RAM beneath. At just 8.5mm thin it is still remarkable that this is a full Windows PC.

Thinner radial vents blend nicely into the Surface Pro chassis.

Not only do I have no complaints about the Surface Pro 2017's design I feel like it is essentially perfected at this point. Everything is balanced for weight, there are no screws or seams, and even the radio antenna on the top blends in nicely. With fewer visible grates, the new radial vent looks, well, less vent-y.

Surface Pro still stands out from all 2-in-1 PCs and tablets, and it is just a handsome looking device.

Lots to love

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 display

For 2017, Microsoft is keeping the 12.3-inch 2736 x 1824 (267 PPI) Pixel Sense display for the Surface Pro at the ideal 3:2 aspect ratio. It is an IPS LCD with ten-point multi-touch with glossy edge-to-edge glass. At first glance, the screen doesn't seem all that different than the 19-month-old Surface Pro 4, but a lot has changed with its production and quality.

Best external monitors for Surface Pro (Image credit: Daniel Rubino / Windows Central)

The biggest change with the new Surface Pro are the new color profiles, which are like those found in the Surface Studio. Microsoft carried over a lot of what it learned from making the Surface Studio's display to the Surface Pro. There are only two profiles right now – sRGB and Enhanced – with the former aimed at professionals who need a neutral color palate for photo or video editing (or those who prefer more "naturally" saturated colors).

The second one, Enhanced, is what I imagine most people will opt for — especially if you use the Surface Pro to consume media like movies. Enhanced saturates the display, giving an almost HDR-look that resembles AMOLED or even Sharp IGZO screens. The new screen pops with a full-color gamut. Interestingly, neither color profile is found in the new Surface Laptop.

The new Surface Pro display in 'enhanced' mode looks amazing for TV and movies.

Color accuracy is also very good at 97 percent Adobe sRGB and 75 percent Adobe RGB during a color calibration test. That is about a one percent increase from the Surface Pro 4, which was found to have 96 percent Adobe sRGB. While excellent and above average those numbers are below the new Surface Laptop, which has 99 percent Adobe sRGB and 80 percent Adobe RGB. It's known that those displays while similar are different with Surface Pro having better support for Surface Pen.

Another point worth mentioning is the lack of LED hot spots near the edge of the display. While all IPS screens have some form of edge light bleed, Surface devices in the past have been prone to larger and noticeable bright areas. The review unit I tested did not suffer from any hotspot issues, and the Surface team claims to have solved that manufacturing problem.

The display bezels are the same size as with the older Surface Pros, and while the trend in PCs is to make bezels as thin as possible, the Surface Pro is first a tablet. Those edges help in holding the Surface Pro and not activating the display — in addition to hiding various radio components including the antenna. I have no problem with bezels on tablets like this, but you'll be disappointed if you were hoping for a Dell Infinity Edge screen here.

Users can dynamically toggle sRGB and enhanced color profiles in the Action center.

Overall, the Surface Pro's screen is nearly perfect. The 12.3-inch size may not be ideal for those who prefer something larger, but that is a personal preference. The colors, brightness, clarity and the new enhanced color profile make this display the best Surface Pro yet. It's just beautiful.

Fast, smooth, and entirely optional

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 Pen inking

The Surface Pen has also been reworked for 2017 with 4,096 levels of pressure — four times the sensitivity of the previous pen. Activation force – the amount of pressure required before the pen activates – is down to a mere nine grams. For the first time in a Surface Pen, you'll now find tilt and rotation support, letting artists create more life-like pencil strokes for shading.

All of that is great, but it is the reduced latency that is the star of the show. Latency is how fast the ink registers on display after a pen stroke – the faster you draw, the more noticeable any lag becomes, and the more our brains sense that there's something artificial happening in front of us. After all, real-world analog pens have zero latency. Dropping from 40 milliseconds to just 21 is a massive accomplishment, and a lot of it is due to the new co-processor found in the Surface Pro's display that connects the GPU to the screen's digitizer and helps speed up pen calculations.

The reduced latency is fantastic. The new Surface Pen on the new Surface Pro is much more fluid, smooth, and lifelike compared to the older version. It makes me want to use the pen more (notwithstanding my complete lack of artistry).

Surface Pen battery life is still estimated to be one year for the single AAAA battery based on regular usage every day.

The new Surface Pen on the new Surface Pro is much more fluid and smooth — and makes me want to use the pen more.

To be clear, all newer Surfaces – including Surface Pro 3, Pro 4, Book, and Studio – will see improvements with pressure (up to 4,096 levels), fine-tuning of activation force and improved latency. That will be accomplished through driver updates over time. Tilt support will be coming to Surface Book and Surface Studio as well with a software update.

Only the new Surface Pro gets all those benefits at the 21ms latency level on day one, making it the best Windows Inking experience around. Without the new coprocessor, it's unlikely older Surface devices will be able to catch up.

Other physical changes to the pen include the removal of the shirt clip, which gives a larger magnetic side to attach to the Surface Pro. It works well, and while it may still get knocked off in your bag, it will be harder to so.

Inking has always been a focus of the Surface line, and Microsoft is keeping Surface Pro on its toes. It's a real joy to use despite the higher $99 price point.

It is also worth noting that you can now use the Surface Dial directly on the display just like Surface Studio.

What's new is the same as before

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 Type Cover

The refreshed Surface Type Cover line is more about minor improvements rather than a complete redesign. The Surface Pro 4's Type Cover is easily the best Microsoft created, so it makes sense to bring that forward with the new Alcantara-decked ones for this year. This synthetic plastic fabric has a similar feel to suede, but without the environmental impact of raising and slaughtering cows to make leather. It's warm and inviting, and the new color options (Burgundy, Cobalt Blue, and Platinum) match the Surface Laptop, Surface Pen, and even Surface Arc Mouse.

There are concerns about Alcantara longevity, but at least with a Surface Pro, you could always get a new Type Cover (versus Surface Laptop, where it is part of the keyboard deck). I like the feel — it looks great, feels fantastic, and simply works well. The new color options are muted, but elegant.

Everything you need to know about Alcantara

Key travel is still 1.3mm (Surface Laptop is a hair deeper at 1.5mm), and the actuation and response feel as great as before. I had no problem typing on the new Type Cover, and enjoyed it as much as the old ones. It's basically the same as before, anyway.

There are some other improvements, including dedicated keys for display brightness, instead of a secret key combo for that function. There are the volume, play/pause, and keyboard backlight keys as well. Backlighting is still three stages and works well in low-light situations.

New trackpad is as good as old one (may still be small for some users).

Microsoft made some minor improvements to the Precision trackpad as well, but it appears to be more superficial. The size is the same, and I couldn't pick up on any performance differences. Nonetheless, it works perfectly, and while it could always be larger, it is enjoyable to use for extended durations.

The magnets that hold the Type Cover to the Surface Pro feel stronger, though this could be in my head. Either way, you really must tug to remove the Type Cover.

Microsoft nearly perfected Surface Type Cover with Surface Pro 4. This year's version, while not radically different, has no glaring flaws. The added display brightness keys, new colors, and Alcantara just make it all better.

Turn it up (a bit)

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 audio

Microsoft rightly puts the dual stereo speakers at the edge of the Surface Pro's display. The placement means they are front-firing, with excellent fidelity and stereo separation.

The speakers with Surface Pro are improved over the Surface Pro 4 — they're larger and more powerful, along with Dolby Audio Premium support. The two companies are working closely together across Windows 10 and even Xbox One to bring Dolby support to the hardware and software.

These minor improvements result in excellent audio quality for music, movies, and Skype calls. While Surface Laptop has richer sound thanks to its larger size and speaker placement, the Surface Pro is quite impressive for its size. Audio is crisp, clear, and loud without distortion.

Instant on

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 Windows Hello and Cameras

A lot of work went into Windows 10 and Surface Pro to make resuming from sleep/standby "instant." The idea is to make the PC more tablet or smartphone-like so users can just get to work, and I think Microsoft has mostly succeeded.

Tapping the power button or keyboard to wake the Surface Pro turns on the display, activating the face recognition camera (Windows Hello) and logging in the user in about 2.5 seconds. It is remarkably fast. By the time you remove your hand from the power button, you are ready to work. It's a delight to be able to sit down, press a button, and be ready to go.

The Windows Hello system is now 'blacked-out' in the display bezel.

The Surface Pro will still hibernate, which takes longer to wake from than sleep, so there is still some residual "this is a PC" experience. However, Microsoft noted that Surface Pro learns when you use it so that it should not hibernate during your frequently used work hours.

The IR lenses for Windows Hello are now blacked out letting them blend into the display bezel. A minor detail, but Surface is about minimalism.

Surface Pro's front-facing 5MP camera is better than average.

Even the rear AF 8MP camera is impressive.

The front-facing camera is still 5MP with 1080p resolution. It is very bright and looks fantastic in video – better than most premium laptops. The rear 8MP autofocus camera with 1080p HD video camera is surprisingly useful for classrooms to snap pictures of whiteboards and to use Office Lens to save the content. And sure, you can even use it to snap a photo in a pinch and not cringe at the quality.

A compact Core i7 monster

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 benchmarks

While I feel the new fanless Core i5 Surface Pro is the sweet spot, the dual-core Core i7-7660U and Iris Plus 640 Graphics are fantastic combos — especially in a device that weighs just 1.73lbs (784g).


For synthetic benchmarks, the Core i7-7660U is a massive performer, even beating the quad-core Core i7-7700HQ found in the Dell XPS 15 in Geekbench's single-core tests.

Geekbench 4.0 benchmarks (higher is better)

Swipe to scroll horizontally
DeviceCPUSingle coreMulti core
Surface Pro 2017i7-7660U4,5139,346
Dell Latitude 5285i7-7600U4,6359,289
Dell XPS 15 (9560)i7-7700HQ4,50313,587
Samsung Notebook 9 15 Exti7-7500U4,3168,320
Lenovo X1 Carboni5-7300U4,1398,311
Dell XPS 13 (9360)i7-6560U4,1207,829
HP Spectre 13i7-7500U4,1007,469
Surface Booki7-6600U3,9777,486
Surface Laptopi5-7200U3,7257,523
Surface Pro 4i5-6300U3,3196,950


In a test aimed more at the graphics capability, the Intel Iris Plus 640 Graphics also perform exceptionally well.

Geekbench 4.0 OpenCL (higher is better)

Swipe to scroll horizontally
DeviceCompute score
Surface Pro 201730,678
HP Spectre x360 1528,868
Samsung Notebook 9 15 Ext23,207
Dell Latitude 528521, 921
HP EliteBook x360 G221,512
Dell XPS 13 (9360)19,410
Surface Laptop19,256
Surface Book HD52018,197
Surface Pro 417,395

What makes that 30,678 GeekBench OpenCL score for Surface Pro impressive is it beats the HP Spectre x360 15 and Samsung Notebook 9 15 Ext — both with NVIDIA GeForce 940MX discrete GPUs. Users who need rendering power or engage in casual gaming will like the punch of the high-end Surface Pro.


Unlike the 256GB Surface Laptop, Microsoft did the 512GB Surface Pro well with its solid-state drive (SSD). The unit reviewed here included a Samsung PM971 (KUS040202M) SSD and its performance is impressive:

CrystalDiskMark (higher is better)

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Surface Pro 20171,284 MB/s963 MB/s
Lenovo X1 Carbon1,518 MB/s1,188 MB/s
Samsung Notebook 9 Ext1,365 MB/s1,213 MB/s
HP EliteBook x360 G21,129 MB/s916 MB/s
Dell XPS 13 (9360)1,287 MB/s794 MB/s
HP Spectre x360 151,128 MB/s862 MB/s
Surface Book1,018 MB/s967 MB/s
Surface Laptop423 MB/s237 MB/s

While not quite the fastest SSD, the Samsung PM971 is an excellent solution for the Surface Pro. For those who are disappointed with the Surface Laptop's SSD, you'll like what Microsoft is using here.

Caution should be noted, though: PC makers tend to use a multitude of SSDs in production due to supply availability. So not all Surface Pros may be using this SSD – indeed, it may even be limited to the high-end Core i7 model, which makes some sense.


Looking at PCMark Home Conventional – which is an overall performance test - the new Surface Pro also does well.

PCMark (Home Conventional 3.0)

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Surface Pro 20173,055Better than 57 percent of all results
Dell Latitude 52853,079Better than 57 percent of all results
Samsung Notebook 9 15 Ext2,998Better than 57 percent of all results
Lenovo X1 Carbon Core i52,965Better than 57 percent of all results
HP EliteBook x360 G22,916Better than 52 percent of all results
Dell Latitude 72802,829Better than 52 percent of all results
HP Spectre x360 152,472Better than 41 percent of all results
Surface Laptop Core i52,494Better than 40 percent of all results

Compared to the Surface Book's last-generation Core i7-6600U, the new Surface Pro is a significant jump in performance. The similarly specced and business-oriented Dell Latitude 5285 also does quite well compared to the Surface Pro.

Overall, the Surface Pro with a Core i7 and Intel Iris Plus 640 is a surprisingly powerful combination, especially with this form factor. While you will pay a lot for the privilege at least, Microsoft is fully utilizing the best tech around for maximum performance.

Work all day

Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 battery

Despite the impressive benchmarks for the Core i7 model, the Surface Pro stays surprisingly cool under CPU and GPU duress.

During thirty minutes of benchmarking with simulated photo editing and casual gaming, the Surface Pro with Core i7 never went over 104 degrees F (40 degrees C) on the back; the display stayed at just 100 degrees F (38 degrees C), which is warm but not hot to the touch. That is quite remarkable with the performance attained from the CPU and GPU, and it shows Microsoft did do a lot of thermal engineering.

While warm the Core i7 Surface Pro never got hot under extended CPU and GPU load.

Likewise, for fan noise. During the thirty minutes of benchmarking the fan did come on and was audible, though barely above a whisper with no whine or high-pitch noises.

The fans on the Surface Pro are sooooo quiet.

In a room with ambient noise, you would struggle to hear the Surface Pro even when the fan is running. That is a momentous change from the infamous "hiss" of previous Surface Pro devices. At no point did I ever find the fan noise annoying. During non-intensive tasks, the fan is either not running, or not audible enough to notice. When just browsing the web, or using the Windows Store app, you could almost convince me the Core i7 version was also fanless.

For battery life, Microsoft claims 13.5 hours using a closed-loop video test. My real-world usage puts it closer to eight hours – maybe slightly more – which is a significant bump from the Surface Pro 4, which peters out around six hours.

On a cross-country flight from Boston to L.A., I watched a two-hour movie, played about 15 minutes of Pinball FX2, and spent a couple of minutes just playing with the OS. I still had 71 percent battery left when I landed. On another occasion, after the Xbox E3 liveblog, which was just over 2.5 hours (including one hour of waiting for the event to start) I had 73 percent battery left from a full charge.

In using Surface Pro 3 and Pro 4 extensively, this is the first time I felt like I could go to work without the AC charger (which is also smaller this year).

Just as importantly is stand-by battery life. If you charge the Surface Pro to 100 percent and leave it overnight (or even a few days), the next time you turn it on it will still be at 100 percent. That, too, is a welcome change.

Surface Pro 2017

Surface Pro

The sum of its parts

The Bottom Line: Microsoft Surface Pro 2017

The Surface Pro 4 was a momentous achievement for Microsoft, but the device had a very rough start due to issues with its Intel "Skylake" processor. Even once those problems subsided, the device still ran hot, had a hissing fan, and battery life always approached being acceptable, but often fell short for users when compared to the competition.

Microsoft has seemingly solved these issues – and more – with the new Surface Pro for 2017. Sure, it may look the same from a distance, but it is the sum of its parts that makes it a delightful experience. I confess all this despite not being a Surface Pro fan. I like the device, but I gravitate towards traditional laptops. That changed with the new Surface Pro, and here is why:

  • Battery life is all-day now and doesn't deplete in stand-by.
  • It doesn't get hot, nor is the fan loud.
  • It feels better to hold and use.
  • Instant-on makes you want to use it often.
  • The display looks fantastic with the new Enhanced color profile.

I could also throw in what a beast the Core i7 model is, rivaling many of my laptops. And while I'm still not a hardcore Surface Pen user, it's so good to use I want to do more with it.

Microsoft managed to cover all the bases with Surface Pro to make it a very versatile – but just as importantly – a reliable machine. It is the first time I felt the lines between powerful PCs and tablets definitively blurring.

Should Surface Pro 3 users upgrade?

Absolutely. There is just too much that is new and improved that the jump is well worth it if you can swing the cost.

Should Surface Pro 4 users upgrade?

While not a big a leap, if the battery life or fan noise of the Surface Pro 4 is a disappointment, then the 2017 Surface Pro will be a welcome upgrade. If you do much inking, it's an essential upgrade. Either way, there's the cost to consider — your Surface Pro 4 is a year-and-a-half old at most and is still plenty capable.

The first Surface for you?

If you have never owned a Surface Pro but have thought about it, then this is the one to get.

Microsoft convinced many that the Surface Pro is a solution to the tablet versus laptop problem. It took a few years to get there, but in 2017 that vision has never been more clearly articulated. The Surface Pro is the culmination of the previous releases with nothing but improvements all around. It's astonishingly beautiful, reliable, and delightful to use. Whether you can justify the cost – which is admittedly not cheap, nor value-driven – is another question. But the quality and experience are never better with the new Surface Pro.

Surface Pro for 2017 is Microsoft vision of modern computing, and it's a lot of fun.

The new Surface Pro is now available in 26 markets world-wide.

See Surface Pro at Microsoft (opens in new tab)


  • Solid battery life and outstanding performance.
  • Beautiful display with new color profiles.
  • New Surface Pen is a joy.
  • Stays cool and barely makes any fan noise.
  • Instant on is instant awesome.


  • Type Cover and Pen not included — gets expensive quickly.
  • No USB Type-C or Thunderbolt 3.
  • 2-in-1 kickstand design isn't for everyone.
Daniel Rubino

Daniel Rubino is the Editor-in-chief of Windows Central, head reviewer, podcast co-host, and analyst. He has been covering Microsoft since 2007 when this site was called WMExperts (and later Windows Phone Central). His interests include Windows, laptops, next-gen computing, and for some reason, watches. Before all this tech stuff, he worked on a Ph.D. in linguistics, watched people sleep (for medical purposes!), and ran the projectors at movie theaters because it was fun.

  • You know I'm sure the bit about it finally achieving what a true 2-in-1 has been said about every version since SP3....this isn't a bad thing necessarily, obviously it shows they keep coming up with tweaks to what a 2-in-1 should be and do so continues to do what the Surface line was designed to do....push things forwards and show what can be achieved. Sure, it's in smaller increments since the Pro 3 but great we are still moving forwards with these devices and not staying still
  • I really want to hear what's the loudest the i7 model can be with the fans on. On my i7 Pro 3 somebody thought it was raining outside when they kicked in 😂 Hope you can get an i5 at some point too, to review the performance
  • The i7 SP3 my work gave me has a loud fan too, but my personal SP4 is insanely quiet. I have to hold my ear near the vents to tell if the fan is on or not. It sounds like the new SP is even better.
  • The pressure points bit is very interesting, since the Pro 3 didn't get that benefit with the Pro 4 pen.
  • Include the pen, add USB-C and then I'll toss alll my money at them.
  • USB-C will probably be next year, but I doubt they're going to include the pen anymore. I got one with my SP4, and I barely use it.
  • I lost the Pen for my SP2 and decided I wasn't going to replace it since the price was so high for a new one, didn't thin I used it all that much. After a week I was placing an order. I don't use the pen a whole lot, but when I do it is definately worth the price of admission. Just pissed that the Pen is excluded now excluded.
  • I think by not including it Microsoft was able to make a much better pen than in years past. I love the pen, I own a Surface 3 and really like it.. I'm looking forward to upgrade to the new Surface Pro in the near future.
  • How so? From the extra profit they'll make by not including a pen sold at $99 while keeping the actual Surface Pro price the same as when it did include the pen?
  • Actually, Microsoft did say they were able to sink more costs into the actual Surface Pro without raising the base price by not including the pen.
  • Daniel is the new type cover flexy at all?   that was one of the issues I had with my surface 3.   The keyboard felt flexy and "not premium".   How's this one stack up?   I have to say though,  MS's devices now are KILLER looking....Love the color choices  more adult than preteen.  
  • I can't tell the difference between 'em for flex. Seem exactly the same to me. Personal preference, but I really love the Sp4/new SP era Type Covers. They're just so perfect IMO.
  • I get that, but it just doesn't seem that way when the price is roughly the same but you don't get the pen now. Most every manufacturer upgrades their devices each year and keeps a lid on the price increase. Maybe all the changes justify the assertion, but to many it just seems $100 more expensive than last year.
  • 😍😍😍
  • Great review. This is what I would love as my PC for work. With the great battery life and instant on it is going to be perfect in the car for getting that quick quote out to a customer and checking records for them quickly. So many times I reach for my phone (950XL over the iPhone 6 that was given to me for work) because the current laptop I have, although reasonably quick to turn on and ok battery life, just isn't as quick as reaching for the phone. However the screen size is limiting. The Surface Pro seems to be that perfect 2 in 1 device acting as a touch enabled device and a PC all in one... plus you have the outstanding screen to work with. 😀
  • You are parked when you do this, right?
  • Wow, wow, wow... Nice review, joy to read it.
  • Well... then you think about when Dan was NOT pumped about any Microsoft product. Even the Surface 1 was the best of the best.
  • I think I was more critical of Surface Laptop compared to larger tech outlets, actually. I also never reviewed S1 or S2 (though I owned/used them).
  • I take back that you reviewed the Surface 1. I just mean... come on Microsoft has done a lot wrong and I have never seen you say anything about it. You could do much more good if you would write an article about what could be done better, which I think I have never seen since I read Windows Central daily (probably since 2011 or 2012).
  • You just have selective memory. I've wrote an article just recently about how they flubbed Surface Laptop announcement and Win10 S messaging; or how MS needs to talk about Mobile plans ASAP at build, or the USB Type-C issue. What you want is for me to evidently take your position on things and write that. Your idea of things to be critical about do not necessarily mean I have to agree with it, or that they are universally accepted. Furthermore, we have other writers on this site who also take Microsoft to task. Either way, that's enough for now. I'm not hear to justify what I write. Literally nothing you have said so far is actually about my review, refutes or challenges anything I have said, or points out flaws in what I wrote in my conclusion about the new Surface Pro.
  • I agree with Dan on this one. There have been plenty of Microsoft articles where the tone was a bit negative. There was a run of articles recently that spelled out the "doom and gloom" we find the MS mobile space in currently. Dan has been critical of Microsoft in podcasts as well. I like that Dan is critical about Ms but also is fair to them when they get things right. It seems like a more realistic approach than deciding to flat out hate or praise a company. The Verge does that enough.
  • I just dont find it anywhere balanced. There is tons of stupid decisions by Microsoft and there is barely a negative article about that. And when it's negative, sometimes you have to go find it hidden between the lines. For me that's not enough. I think, Warren does give more feedback on both positive and negative than Dan. There is "an other little website" that does write a lot more balanced and just says when something's not right and when something is good as it is. I like that and I am missing this here a bit.
  • Do you only know how to speak in hyperbole?  Has it ever occured to you that what you view as "tons of stupid decisions by Microsoft" are a matter of your own personal preference?  Literally, the only problem I have with this incarnation of the Surface is that the pen is not only not included but has been bumped up in price.  I can't even fuss over the lack of USB C because Panos was not wrong in that people are NOT currently using it to it's potential and they'd just complain that their phone charger doesn't work because people are just that ignorant. A reviewer being overtly negative about a product should never equate to "This person's opinion is automatically more legit".  Quite frankly, if you want someone who will trash this product becasue their personal tastes align more with yours (or because they have a stake in another company), this is probably the wrong website for you.  
  • It took me longer than most of the time to think about if I am going to answer you. You should think about your tone and I don't know why you're mad at me. First of all, I did never say that I wanted someone to thrash this product. My OP was off topic (and so are you by answering to it). You should try working on your reading comprehension. Secondly. There are decisions that I might not like by my personal preference and I never said anything else. There are also decisions that are stupid because of the outcome. If I make a decision and it bankrupts my company, it probably was a stupid decision wasn't it? You can't forge your own "right or wrong" by saying that's a personal decision. Life is not black and white, but there are some parts of it where you can for sure say if it's very dark or very bright. Third. What Panos said about the people using the wrong charger is the simplest example of a probably stupid decision. It is very oldschool and also very close-minded to say that thousands of users are just too stupid to use your device. A newer approach for companies very simple: make smarter software. For example, a simple message could pop up, when the driver detects too low voltage to charge the Surface telling the user to use the original charger*. The fact that Microsoft's product manager didn't think of that is stunning. Also, there are multiple of questions [1][2][3] with houndreds of replies about these issues unanswered by Microsoft. I can assure you that many of those people are using the original charger and it's broken (I also was one of them!). You can't tell if it's broken or it's something else. You just have to buy a new charger and try. It's a quality issue of the charger, when I bought a new one (the replacement was really expensive at that time!), it worked. Before writing mad, maybe just read calm and try to think about what you just read. And then think again. And again. And dont write anything. * Samsung uses a similar approach with the waterproof Galaxy Smartphones. If it's wet, it won't let you charge it (for obvious reasons) and it will show a message telling you that you need dry your phone. By Panos' logic, the phone would just start burning and it's the user who was too stupid to know that.
  • Side Note: Microsoft misused the USB-Standard for the charger of at least the Surface 3. Micro USB was never thought of being used to charge tablets like Surface 3. So Microsoft thought their were smarter (see: an other stupid decision) and created a custom Micro-USB charger with a higher voltage. You can be happy if you don't break other electronic devices if you plug the Surface 3 charger in (hell, my Samsung Phone thinks it's wet and won't even charge if I plug in the Surface 3 charger). But according to Panos, it would be the User's fault for being stupid.
  • Why do you think they do article of "here's what's good, and here's what's bad"? It's to give both sides of the argument.
  • still love my surface pro 4, I don't think it worth the upgrade, I'll keep my cash for a Xbox One X instead
  • Thanks for the review. I have a question concerning the surface connect. Anyone knows whatis the performance? With the future usb-c dongle, will it be possible to connect an e-gpu?
  • 99% sure no eGPU, which is dependent on Thunderbolt 3-level bandwidth. Heck, some TB3-enabled devices still can't do eGPU either (see Dell).
  • "Heck, some TB3-enabled devices still can't do eGPU either (see Dell)." Wait what? Well I now totally understand what Panos meant about USB-C confusion.
  • Yeah, XPS 13/XPS 15 only use 2x PCIe lanes, not 4, which is what is needed. It's tricky stuff. Even if Thunderbolt 3 there are caveats to it.
  • Yeah, like Dan said, Dell uses 2 lanes on some of their their thin Thunderbolt 3 devices. From what I've read you can use e-GPUs but it reduces the graphics card performance by another 20%. Some reductions are made because it is external (about 10%) and if you're piping the graphics back into the screen of the device you're using , vice an external monitor connected to the Razer Core /Akitio external Thunderbolt graphics hub, you can lose up to an additional 20% of performance.
  • Interesting. I didn't consider piping the graphics back to the main screen as even a possible use case. If I had an eGPU box, I would use it to hook up an external monitor every time.
  • Thanks for the great review, Daniel. I have two questions. Firstly, when you say that you think that the upcoming Connect port USB-C dongle is unlikely to work with an eGPU, does that mean that I won't be able to connect a USB-C monitor (eg Asus MB169C+ or their new ZenScreen MB16AC)? Sorry if that's a dumb question, but I don't really know what an eGPU is (beyond translating the acronym)! Secondly, if I only use theb Surface Pro to run Outlook and Excel (not huge spreadsheets) and cloud-based appilcations on a web browser, will the m3/4GB model be powerful enough?
  • You can bet that almost any usb-C peripheral that doesn't require Thunderbolt will work just fine. Don't know what that new ASUS ZenScreen uses, so I can't give you a specific answer. Check the specs for input and that should help you clarify
  • Thank you, Neo Nuke. The Asus web site says "MB169C+ is compatible with all DP Alternate (Alt) Mode or DisplayPort over USB-C devices without the need for additional drivers.".  For the newer monitor, Asus web site says "ZenScreen MB16AC only requires a single USB connection for both power and video transmission from your host device. It features an innovative hybrid-signal solution with native support for USB Type-C connections, and uses an installed driver to support USB Type-A connectors for full compatibility. The reversible, any-way-up USB-C design enables quick, hassle-free connection to any device." I don't understand the tech behind video compatibility features and thunderbolt etc, so do these descriptions suggest that either or both Asus monitors will work with the new Surface dongle? 
  • You have to be real careful with Asus's flat monitors. I have one and it is fantastic, BUT.  You have to be careful of how they are driven. The traditional ones, and the one I have, the MB169B+, is driven over a standard USB port using DisplayLink* drivers. The drivers look like another monitor to the system, convert the provided video to bits that go over USB, and the monitor converts those bits back into video. It adds to the processor load to do that conversion on the PC. In the case of a Surface, the single USB port also doesn't supply enough current to power the display, so you must come up with a USB Y cable that you can cpombine some power source (can be the U